Matthew Vernon :
> My feeling at this stage is that the TC are best placed to make a
> decision on the technical merits of the various possible init
> replacements and how we might deploy them in Debian. Given that there
> is also a political element to this discussion, we could consider a GR
> in
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 06:06:12PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> PS: BTW, Guillem what's a status of this GR-proposal?
No seconds. Many objections.
The TC has a decision. The flame is finally smoldering out. Can we move
on as a project?
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Pro
Hello,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 06:06:12PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> > PS: BTW, Guillem what's a status of this GR-proposal?
>
> No seconds. Many objections.
Sorry, I don't see this. Second proposal actually has
sponsors, e.g.:
h
On Sat, February 15, 2014 15:06, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> I feel that if the GR results on the quoted above pool would
> be different from TC - that may affect other TC decisions.
>
> Ian, would you like to sponsor GR in this form?
>
> PS: BTW, Guillem what's a status of this GR-proposal?
With
4 matches
Mail list logo
