Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Ossipoff
>> But what if the B voters know for a fact that the A voters are >> completely conscientious, responsible, and co-operative, and that the >> A voters are sure to rank B over C? > >> Sure, I agree that there are a number of good reaons why the chicken >> dilemma needn't be a problem. But, even if i

Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Ossipoff
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > (With apologies to the non-Americans on -vote... :) > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:56:49AM -0400, Michael Ossipoff wrote: >> One reason why I've been advocating Schwartz Woodal (along with >> Woodall and Benham) is because, in official publi