On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> The big goal, for me at least, and hopefully for the other participants, is an
> eventual agreement on what the constitution says, or alternatively, a broadly
> accepted amendment of the constitution that clarifies unclear matters and
> settles t
Hi,
> - To help voters choose, the following people should be able to
>require the Secretary to quote on each GR ballot form a URL
>of their choice, to be used by them for disseminating their vews on
>the vote:
>The Proposer of each resolution or amendment
>The Project
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> The GR ballot should only give the URL on vote.debian.org where you would
> find links behind each proposer/seconder. Ideally those links point
> directly to the debian-vote archive so that it lets people jump into
> discussions directly and form their own opinion.
I th
- "Ian Jackson" wrote:
> A. De-entrenchment: this is very unlikely to achieve the required
> supermajority. But it should be on the ballot anyway when
> we put this mess to a vote after lenny.
> B. Developers are to interpret: this is I think the only workable
> option and given that we h
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The constitution should really be clear so that interpretation is almost
> never needed.
Agreed.
> We should fix the constitution so that we can leave the duty of
> interpreting the constitution to the secretary.
Agreed.
> We ju
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> > Do you really think it would have been difficult to obtain 2Q seconds
> > for a resolution to recall the previous vote, and postpone it until
> > some of the more obvious glitches had been better ironed out? [...]
>
> Yes, based on the summary
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Coming up with a new Oracle (was: Re: First call
for votes for the Lenny release GR)"):
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > - The Secretary should explicitly have the power to delay a GR
> >vote by up to (say) two weeks for the purposes of
> >
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Coming up with a new Oracle (was: Re: First call for
votes for the Lenny release GR)"):
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The constitution should really be clear so that interpretation is almost
> > never needed.
>
> Agreed.
>
Matthew Vernon writes ("Re: Purpose of the Constitution and the Foundation
Documents"):
> [Ian Jackson:]
> > - To help voters choose, the following people should be able to
> >require the Secretary to quote on each GR ballot form a URL
> >of their choice, to be used by them for disseminat
Ean Schuessler writes ("Re: Purpose of the Constitution and the Foundation
Documents"):
> [Ian Jackson] wrote:
> > A. De-entrenchment: this is very unlikely to achieve the required
> > supermajority. But it should be on the ballot anyway when
> > we put this mess to a vote after lenny.
...
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
