On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 08:52:55PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst (wou...@debian.org) [081229 15:36]:
> > - In a country, the body that decides whether a law is or is not
> > unconstitutional, can only do so when a citizen explicitly asks it to
> > do so. In the absence of such
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:18:02PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
> 1: I'd be happier, though, if those proposing and seconding options
> would be more careful about the effects that their options may have,
> and be more vigilant about withdrawing options when more palletable
> options exist. Yo
* Wouter Verhelst (wou...@debian.org) [081230 14:23]:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 08:52:55PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > The problem isn't that the secretary has the first call - but IMHO there
> > should be an instance of appeal like the TC (though this isn't technical,
> > but we have a body th
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Well, let's say you should not propose or second an option you don't
> plan to rank above "further discussion".
I agree. "Rank first" is a bit absolutist; "Rank highly" is more
appropriate, and what I used in later mails in this thread.
Don Armstrong
4 matches
Mail list logo
