Moin,
On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
> When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for
> 60 days or more
besides that this proposal still has at least the problem of "who determines
how" (that the DFSG has been violated) I have been thinking th
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:05:34AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Moin,
>
> On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
> > When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for
> > 60 days or more
>
> besides that this proposal still has at least the problem of "w
Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 20:26 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> I'd appreciate if you don't use a GR procedure for that, though, it makes us
> look like a bunch of clowns.
> it makes us look like a bunch of clowns.
> look like a bunch of clowns
> a bunch of clowns
> clowns
> --
> Robert Mi
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:32:52AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 20:26 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> > I'd appreciate if you don't use a GR procedure for that, though, it makes us
> > look like a bunch of clowns.
>
> > it makes us look like a bunch of clowns.
>
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:17:46PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> 21:22 < vorlon> oh yes, that's right, *sending chocolate* makes us look
> like a bunch of clowns
> 21:34 < nyu> vorlon: don't put words in my mouth, thanks
> 21:35 < vorlon> nyu: what should I put in your mouth?
>
> Let this s
On Sat, Oct 25 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:37:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > > Nevertheless I would merge it in my proposal if you still want me to.
>
>> > If we must have a GR, I would
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice
> ---
> The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves,
> applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from
> the linux-2.
Le dimanche 26 octobre 2008 à 15:17 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit :
> For those who didn't get Josselin's witty remark, this happens because I dared
> to complain that my words were being missrepresented by Steve Langasek on IRC,
> pretending that I said something I never did.
No, this happens beca
[Robert Millan]
> +
> + When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the
> + Debian Free Software Guidelines for 60 days or more, and
> + none of the solutions that have been implemented (if any) is
> considered
> + suitable by the maintainers, the pa
> - Following the announcement of the 22nd of October on the
> debian-devel-announce
>mailing list (Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) about "Developer
>Status";
>
> - Given the importance of defining how the Project accepts new members;
>
> - Because of the strong opposition to the m
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:00:27PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Robert Millan]
> > +
> > + When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the
> > + Debian Free Software Guidelines for 60 days or more, and
> > + none of the solutions that have been implemented (i
Sorry, I can't reply to the original mail itself, I hope this suffices.
Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > - Following the announcement of the 22nd of October on the
> > debian-devel-announce
> >mailing list (Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) about "Developer
> >Status";
> >
> > - Given the impo
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:19, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a reason why those interested in supporting blob-dependant hardware
> can't make a release that includes those blobs? As per SC #1 they can't refer
> to it as "Debian", but they can use the project's resources to b
13 matches
Mail list logo
