On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, I'm looking for supporters for a GR to stop this gross violation
> of the SC. Any DDs who read this, please let me know if you're
> interested.
Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of
,
| http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_0
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:43 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of
> ,
> | http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007
> | General Resolution: Handling source-less firmware in the Linux kernel
> `
>
> To get a special dispensation for
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I object to a second round of this. I was ok with it once, as a
> compromise, but the understanding I had then was that it was a one-time
> thing, to give time to actually *fix* the problem.
Note that there is currently activ
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > I object to a second round of this. I was ok with it once, as a
> > compromise, but the understanding I had then was that it was a one-time
> > thing, to give time to
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > We need the relevant maintainers to be told "your unwillingness to fix
> > > this means we will
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> No, really. The kernel team are volunteers. Ordering them to do things
> doesn't help at all; one could equally well send the same message to
> everyone working on Debian (or, indeed, the wider community) since they
> could also step up to th
6 matches
Mail list logo
