On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I fail to understand why Manoj sees this as such a silly idea, and it
>
> Because the number of hats does not seem to be a good predictor
> for performance -- at least, not for a low number of hats. There a
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:22:01 -0300, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I fail to understand why Manoj sees this as such a silly idea, and
>> > it
>>
>> Because the number of hats does not seem to be a good pr
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When people are talking about limiting hats, obviously aren't talking
> > only about the ctte.
>
> The proposal was to limit the presence of many-hat-bearers from
> serving on the ctte.
Ok, I was thinking
3 matches
Mail list logo
