On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:55:37 -0400, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Unfortunately, it seems to me that currently the project has no way of
> dealing with people who refuse to look at new ways of doing things.
Sure. The project has no way of dealing with people who are
Hi,
On Saturday 15 March 2008 22:40, Marc Haber wrote:
> Additionally, it may be a good idea to have regular "IRC conferences"
> where the DPL is available to answer questions. A good time would
> probably be a week after bits have been posted so that the questions
> that the bits have raised can
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> All this replacement in favour of a better person sounds very
> nasty, mean, and likely to be highly subjective to me, and most
> organizations do not often throw people out while they are still
> performing their duties.
Of
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
> infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
> As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
> july.
> (http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-graphs/index.
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
> > number of emails on threads on a issue raised, number of emails sent to
> > the bug report, numbe
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080317 00:24]:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
> > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > The creiteria can be more than just v
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
> > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
> > > number of emails on threads on a
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I see; so there are no members of the technical committee who have
> > failed twice to vote?
>
> I'm not sure how not voting twice in a row makes someone a less
> important contributor by definition.
I see; so what number do you think w
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> But I would really prefer if you would fix your own packages instead of
> relaying on our BSPers.
Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly. The
bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity "important".
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly.
> The bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity
> "important". Perhaps the bugs were tagged incorrectly?
Severity != tag. And the severity is correct.
> I must have missed
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 02:46 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly.
> > The bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity
> > "important". Perhaps the bugs were tagged incorrectly?
>
Please respect list policies and don't duplicate mails.
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity "serious" or
> higher. Has that been changed?
RC != RG.
> > You don't read debian-devel-announce, do you?
>
> Of course I do. What I said wa
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 03:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity "serious" or
> > higher. Has that been changed?
>
> RC != RG.
Ah, well then there is no need to berate me for failing to fix the bug
imm
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 03:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > And what exactly does this have to do with the technical committee?
>
> No idea. It looks like it all started with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and since you're still
> wondering about RC/RG bugs, I'm answering these questions.
It would be a
14 matches
Mail list logo
