Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == Upstream Maintainers ==
[...]
> Authorised by: Existing maintainer
> Notes: package should be co-maintained by maintainer and upstream, upstream
> generally to be expected to be uploading code changes rather than
> packaging changes
I'm not su
* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070625 20:45]:
> You're already doing that in the sense that
> uploading such a package already instructs the BTS to forwards filed
> bugs to that person.
For that there luckily is pts subscription available. (So those bugs
cannot be hidden by closing them befo
On Monday 25 June 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> == Sponsored Maintainers =
>
> For packages that're maintained by non-DDs on an ongoing basis via
> sponsored uploads, DM status provides the sponsor with the opportunity
> to change the upload priveleges from "default-deny" to "default-allow"
> on
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > == N-M Delays
>
> This one suck, because NM delays are mostly fixeable, and DM will just
> make them not painful at all for DD, depriving the system to be fixed.
> This is exactly the use case I fear.
>
> That's why I'd like
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:13:31AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Do we have any numbers on how many non-DD maintainers we have? I'm part of
> that group, but how large a group is this?
There are about 2100 unique email address in the Maintainer: and
Uploaders: field in the unstable S
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070625 20:45]:
> > You're already doing that in the sense that
> > uploading such a package already instructs the BTS to forwards filed
> > bugs to that person.
> For that there luckily is pts s
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
>> around for some time now [...]
>> I've used terms like "initial policy" quite a bit -- [...]
>
> Shortly before
Hi!
* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070626 13:51]:
> There are about 2100 unique email address in the Maintainer: and
> Uploaders: field in the unstable Sources files. That counts mailing
> lists and potentially multiple alternate addresses for DDs as well as
> non-DD maintainers of course.
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Do we have any numbers on how many non-DD maintainers we have? I'm part of
> that group, but how large a group is this?
A very long one-liner[1] gets me 992 in the main unstable archive. Of course
the number is different since the debian-keyring in the unstable
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
> able to tell you the right number.
TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
and via anonymous
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
> interested people is large.
FWIW, I'm happy to put the work into this even if not many people end
up using it.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
>> able to tell you the right number.
>
> TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
>
> merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyr
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
> interested people is large.
I suspect one reason that this thread hasn't resulted in many people
expressing an interest is that non-DDs tend not to read debian-vot
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 27 juin 2007, vers 01:06, Paul
Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I'm a fairly active (non-DD) member of the Java Packaging team, and I
> also maintain a couple of non-Java packages. Although I'm starting to
> become reasonably skilled at Java packaging,
14 matches
Mail list logo
