On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:47:18AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (d) Following the release of etch, the Debian Project as a whole shall
> reopen the question of which commitments should be codified in the
> project's Social Contract. This shall include both an online
> consu
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:47:18AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Some statistics to give an indication (this is based on my local mailbox
> of d-vote for Aug/Sept for subjects containing "source" or "firmware" with
> only some irrelevant subthreads deleted).
> In total 465 posts from approximately 80 d
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Apparently, the proposer and the secretary both felt that the
> form on the ballot was OK -- or do you have a better idea what the
> proposer of the GR wanted? [...]
If only the proposer and secretary need to be happy with the ballot,
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:16:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I asked you this question before privately and haven't seen an answer. You
> say below "So we propose this GR:"; does that mean that everything up to
> that is rationale, and not part of the text that developers will be voti
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:59:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is to drop support (in whole or in part) for
> Broadcom NX2, Sun Cassini(+), Intel PRO/100 (although some of those
> chips are also supported by the unaffected eepro100 driver),
eepro100 is scheduled for removal upstream
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> to the removal from the distribution (main) of "software" that could be
Please, drop the scare quotes on software.
> [...] i. ensure that the Debian community has a good understanding
>of the technical and legal issues that preven
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:47:18AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> There are also indications that a significant group of people within the
>> project feels that the current Social Contract does not meet the best
>> interests of the project in that the curren
With this message I formally second Frans Pop's proposed resolution from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
MJ Ray wrote:
> Which brings me to a related point: some participants in this discussion
> have been poor at mentioning vital roles they hold, or making it clear
> what hat(s) they are wearing. Sorry to break it to people, but 'see
> shy jo' is not that famous yet that it makes everyone remember '
I want to issue a somewhat blanket apology; I'm trying to get better,
but I do so only in fits and starts.
In my posts about the controversial etch/drivers/freeness issue, I
crossed the line more than once into unhelpful and unreflective
posts. I am sorry, and if you were hurt or offended by the
10 matches
Mail list logo
