Re: Question for candidate Schuldei

2006-03-17 Thread Andreas Barth
* Daniel Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060317 02:00]: > #dplteam2006: > < stockholm> - the littel oppinon poll that i did (asking ~30-40 people) > was totally overwealming: everyone but mjg would have been > in favour [of the proposed GR to force people into > DS

Re: Question for candidate Schuldei

2006-03-17 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:59:49AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: > #dplteam2006: > < stockholm> - the littel oppinon poll that i did (asking ~30-40 people) > was totally overwealming: everyone but mjg would have been > in favour [of the proposed GR to force people into >

Re: Question for Ted Walther.

2006-03-17 Thread MJ Ray
"Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of > others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific > evidence of religious discrimination. > > After specificly accusing Jeroen van Wolffelaar of this he asked for > speci

Re: Question for Ted Walther.

2006-03-17 Thread Enrico Zini
#debian-dpl-debate, last night: 01:44 <+TedWalther> JeroenVW: also, I've started keeping IRC logs, which include your own prejudiced attitudes. 01:46 <+JeroenVW> TedWalther: can you prove one quote where I'm discriminating based on religion? Permission to quote granted hereby 01:47 <+T

Re: Candidate questions: expulsions process

2006-03-17 Thread MJ Ray
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > No need - Mark Ray did so earlier in the week. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but I think http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00269.html was disliked, because there was a sudden surge in posting frequency, which many people do when ann

Re: Question for Ted Walther.

2006-03-17 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:57:15PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > >During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of > >others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific > >evidence of religious disc

Re: Questions to the candidates

2006-03-17 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:16:34AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > 4. In light of the well organised presence of Skolelinux and the >professional presence of Ubuntu at several conferences and exhibitions >do you believe Debian is represented adequately? I know it is a biaised view point, bu

Re: Questions to the candidates

2006-03-17 Thread Julien BLACHE
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, >> 4. In light of the well organised presence of Skolelinux and the >>professional presence of Ubuntu at several conferences and exhibitions >>do you believe Debian is represented adequately? > > I know it is a biaised view point, but as far a

Q for all candidates [was Re: Question for Anthony Towns]

2006-03-17 Thread Clint Adams
> Dear Anthony Towns, > > When I sent you a private mail complaining about the ad-hominem style of > one of your posts on -devel, you published it on your blog. Will you do > the same with the private mails sent you as a DPL, if you were elected ? I'd like to know the other candidates' positions

Re: Question for Ted Walther.

2006-03-17 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:27:03PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > Respectfully, dig out the information and present it, or stop claiming > that these things are going on, you are doing nothing but harming not > only your own reputation, but that of others of your religion, myself > included. s