On 3/16/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
obviously. And we also get Penny (who has no choice) because she wasthe one to score the big goals last year. :)Penny will not be in Mexico :( ... & the goal scoring was only because beer was withheld until it happened :P
-- context: http://sh
also sprach Penny Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.16.1001 +0100]:
> obviously. And we also get Penny (who has no choice) because she was
> the one to score the big goals last year. :)
>
> Penny will not be in Mexico :(
:(
That's a real shame. I was sort of implicitly looking forward t
Hi Jonathan!
You might remember my questions from last year[0] regarding the release
process and Xouvert. As I indicated to you, I do not feel your answers
were in any satisfactory: I still feel quite strongly that the 0.2
release of Xouvert never occurred, and that the 0.1 release was a month
lat
During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
evidence of religious discrimination.
After specificly accusing Jeroen van Wolffelaar of this he asked for
specific examples, granting you permission to pull from h
#dplteam2006:
< stockholm> - the littel oppinon poll that i did (asking ~30-40 people)
was totally overwealming: everyone but mjg would have been
in favour [of the proposed GR to force people into
DSA/security/ftpmaster -daniels] and could not really
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:59:49AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> #dplteam2006:
> < stockholm> - the littel oppinon poll that i did (asking ~30-40 people)
> was totally overwealming: everyone but mjg would have been
> in favour [of the proposed GR to force people into
>
(Note: The following is cross-posted to -vote and -project. Please follow
up on topics related to the role of the DPL to -project. Follow up on
topics related to the DPL election on -vote. Thanks!)
Hi everyone,
One of the major problems the project has faced is the inability to take
a stand on
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:57:15PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
evidence of religious discrimination.
After specificly accusing Jeroen van Wolffelaar of this h
Jeroen wrote in his rebuttal:
> Again, though, I differ in the way how to achieve that: one cannot
> pull people actively, but instead, one must ensure Debian is a place
> where great things happen, and then people will come to Debian on their
> own.
People do come to Debian on their own, but th
Hey all,
In my "anti-rebuttal" I tried to give some ways some of the things from
other platforms could be achieved. A simple bit of followup: do you think
that support would be sufficient, and/or is there any additional/different
commitments that would provide you with more effective support from
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>My question, finally, to all candidates, is this: do you feel that this
> is within the practical boundaries and limitations of the DPL's office, and
> do you think that this semi-official responsibility would facilitate
> overcom
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote:
> I don't have days to spend combing through old logs
> and stripping out little bits and deciding what bits of context to keep
> and which to throw away.
If I recall correctly, you have stated multiple times in the last few
days that yo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
My question, finally, to all candidates, is this: do you feel that
this is within the practical boundaries and limitations of the DPL's
office, and do you think that this semi-official responsibility would
facilitate overcoming the
13 matches
Mail list logo
