Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 20:09:11]:
> > > When important teams seem to be disfunctional or have a hard time to
> > > find a structure that scales into the future I would however use my
> > > powers of delegation to restructure the team from the out
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> In the mail to the DPL I mentioned above, James outlined three
> fairly significant technical changes that could be implemented to
> make the job easier, and could be done by anyone, without requiring
> any special priveleges; and also noted why he doesn'
Anthony Towns writes:
> In the mail to the DPL I mentioned above, James outlined three fairly
> significant technical changes that could be implemented to make the
> job easier, and could be done by anyone, without requiring any special
> priveleges;
What would these three things be? I might be i
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > 1. The process "is intended as a last resort" - what steps would
> >you take before initiating or supporting it yourself?
>
> [...] As such, I would also want to ensure that there has been e
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > 2. Do you believe it would be fair to cite someone's non-technical
> >socio-religious views in the reasoning for or against expulsion?
>
> I sure hope you are not seriously asking that.
Sadly, eve
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (As a reference point, I am no longer on any significant Debian mailing
> lists other than -vote because I am sick of people who behave in an
> anti-social manner towards each other. Allowing people to behave as they
> wish to has a direct cost to the project
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Example of non-priviledged services include secondary web services and
> > developers accessible port machines with separate accounts. As an
> > aside, I think there should be more developers-accessible por
also sprach Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.08.0853 +0100]:
> This has been rejected by James Troup.
What was the reason?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer and author:
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Example of non-priviledged services include secondary web services and
> > > developers accessible port machines with separate accounts. As an
> > > aside, I think there should be m
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:54:54PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Example of non-priviledged services include secondary web services and
> > > > developers accessible port mach
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.08.0853 +0100]:
> > This has been rejected by James Troup.
>
> What was the reason?
No reason given.
Regards,
Joey
--
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:35:05AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > In the mail to the DPL I mentioned above, James outlined three
> > fairly significant technical changes that could be implemented to
> > make the job easier, and could be done by anyone, w
[Moving this to -devel, please reply only there, this is not really
voting related stuff. We are talking about things to improve keyring
maintenance, for those not reading -vote.]
Anthony Towns writes:
> So first one was the spam problem, keyring-maint is a well-known address,
> and mails that ar
Majid Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>> > 2. Do you believe it would be fair to cite someone's non-technical
>> >socio-religious views in the reasoning for or against expulsion?
>>
>> I sure hope yo
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:19:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The reason I stepped down as release manager wasn't because of any
> accusations per se, but rather because I felt that I lacked support
> in continuing to act as release manager. That impression was built up
> both by the level of di
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:12:00AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > 2. Asks for too broad knowledge
> >
> > It has been suggested several times over the years that we ask
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:45:27PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> At the time you seemed to defend your decision really aggressively[1],
> although the GR 2004-003 disagreed with your interpretation of the effect
> of Editorial amendments GR to sarge.
2004-001 was the DPL election; -002 was non-free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.03.2006 um 15:34 schrieb Andreas Schuldei:
- Stable security
There was a security blackout during the summer of 2005, with
repercussions in the press and public oppinion, hurting the
project.
Shouldn't it be more: Looking that there w
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 20:09:11]:
>> If you were DPL right now, which teams would you consider making formal
>> delegates regardless of their wishes?
>
> It would depend on weather I had good additional people that
> could ma
Hi,
At the time of writing, about two days left in the vote, 269
people have voted, out of a potential 972.
As you can see, we are still well shy of the 50% mark. If you have
been waiting for the last minute to cast your vote, this is it. I
would not advice waiting for the 11th hour,
Hi,
This is just a draft. If you vote, your ballot shall bounce.
The vote key is valid, though. The order of the candidates on the
ballot is the same as on the http://vote.debian.org/2006/vote_002
page -- which is the order their nomination mails came into my
Inbox.
manoj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
> [ 4 ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases
> [ 2 ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed works without unmodifia
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
> [ 3 ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free
> [ ] Choice 3: GFDL-license
Hi all,
I did an interview with Ted Walther on my blog that you might find interesting:
http://www.aigarius.com/2006/03/10/interview-with-ted.html
Warning: it is very long and is basically a subjective portrayal of
another subjective position.
Note: I am not subscribed to debian-vote, so please C
My Dear Fellow Developers,
I would like to propose a new voting routine as an adjunct (or perhaps replacement) to the DPL race. I propose we allow Developers to nominate one and another (or perhaps themselves) for elimination from the project. Winners would have their membership in the Debian pro
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>The process to expel a developer is described in
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html
>I am not sure whether all expulsion attempts get far enough
>to be recorded on -private or -project as described in
>the pr
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:53:40PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>Hi,
>
>At what point does a Debian Developer's behavior cross the line from
>annoying to destructive? At what point should the Developer be removed
>from the project (key removed from keyring, alioth account disabled, and
>blackliste
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:12:00AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> 2. Asks for too broad knowledge
>>
>> It has been suggested several times over the years that we ask too
Yeah! It should be like Survivor, only with less excitement and more
flaming! This is a great idea, Ean! Please tell us more! Look how many
exclamation marks I am using!
Ari!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No match for "DEBIANSURVIVOR.COM"!
On Thursday 09 March 2006 08:12 pm, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Yeah! It should be like Survivor, only with less excitement and more
> flaming! This is a great idea, Ean! Please tell us more! Look how many
> exclamation marks I am using!
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you believe that anyone in Debian has ever been discriminated against
> for socio-religious views that had no impact on their ability to work in
> the project?
Given the number of people in Debian, it seems probable that
one will have experienced religiou
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:00:22AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:53:40PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
At what point does a Debian Developer's behavior cross the line from
annoying to destructive? At what point should the Developer be
removed from the project (key remov
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:45:44AM +0100, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
>
>Questions for all candidates:
>
>In the Debian project, some people run many functions because they are
>very competent and have free time to help on many different fronts.
>
>The obvious consequence is a concentration of
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.08.0853 +0100]:
>> > This has been rejected by James Troup.
>>
>> What was the reason?
>
> No reason given.
Err, I don't think that's fair. Here's the relevant portion
pe, 2006-03-10 kello 02:52 +, MJ Ray kirjoitti:
> Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Do you believe that anyone in Debian has ever been discriminated against
> > for socio-religious views that had no impact on their ability to work in
> > the project?
>
> Given the number of people in D
35 matches
Mail list logo
