Re: Suggest ballot-by-section of the FDL position GR

On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 12:22 +, MJ Ray wrote: > No. I'll thank you to get better at spotting jokes. I expect there are > others who agree with aj's text on some points and adeodato's on another. > I'd like to have a way to resolve that conflict without it being a choice > between voting for text

Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 16:55 -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > Those in favour of two separate GR's: > > > > * Read my GR proposal [0] and second it (your choice of course). > > * Read Nathanael's amendment proposal [1] t

State of the GR

Hi, As far as I am aware, neither the proposal nor the amendment have been modified/re-ratified; and no other GR or amendment has met the required number of seconds; so the page at http://vote.debian.org/2006/vote_001 is still current and valid. manoj -- Problem solving un