Buddha Buck wrote:
> OK, rip it to shreds.
Thank you for making such a proposal. If I were a DD, I would second it to
get it on the ballot -- because I think it's a clear proposal worth voting
on -- and then I would vote against it because I think it's the wrong way
to go. :-)
--
There are
Michael Banck wrote:
> Having the full source code (and not something obfuscted beyond
> recognition) for a computer program so we are able to fix bugs and, if
> necessary, fork it, seems to be essential to what we're doing, namely
> providing the world with a operating system that rocks (and is f
Michael Banck wrote:
> However, it is very hard to determine and carve in stone the 'point of
> no return' for a release, especially as we are still experimenting with
> the way we do releases. But I guess we could have the release manager
> officially declare a point somewhere in the middle of th
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Umm, I have nothing but proprietary hardware. Never had any
> non-proprietary Hardware. most people don't. Indeed, is there such
> a thing as non-proprietary hardware?
Yes. It's not at *all* common, but if you have completely freely
implementable/modifiable specs fo
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 03:01:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Michael Banck wrote:
> > In contrast, having the possibilty to modify $APPLICATION's stock
> > 'File->Open' icon in its native form, i.e. gimp layers or whatever seems
> > to be of less importance by several orders of magnitude, as
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 03:01:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Hmm. How about an image provided as a binary pixmap dumped as hex and
> embedded into a C source file? :-) (Yes, I found one.) Would that qaulify
> as sufficiently removed from the native form to be an incredible pain in
> the n
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 02:26:18PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> You'd find even less people who'd design fonts. And I don't know how
> many would just modify a given font or rather create a new one from
> scratch.
For the record, I have created a font (this was an apl font, back in
the mid 90s).
Email is Loading . . . .
Image-Not-Showing? F.D.A & U.S.D.A Ap.proved, S.ave M.oney - Or.der T.oday
giacomo consecutive barium dun tuscan lump dominick latex apricot bloc concurrent beast chuck brake divest ebullient bemadden directrix damp abysmal alligator fearsome voltaire concordant coat
The PHP License, version 3.0
Copyright (c) 1999 - 2002 The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms
On 2004-05-06 17:38:17 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The PHP License, version 3.0
Copyright (c) 1999 - 2002 The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
You may like to fix your autoresponder, PHP.net
On Tue, 4 May 2004 00:16:25 +0200, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, Since Craig's proposal [1] seems to have gotten enough seconds
> [2], let me summarize it while giving a new concise title and a new
> thread. Excuse me if I am biased.
If you want to see this adopted as the r
Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.58/dose
Hydrocodone$2.17/dose
Xanax...$2.53/dose
Valium..$2.67/dose
Phentermine..$0.80/dose
Stock is limit
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for my bad english, but that's exactly my point of view: not all
> software can be truly free without a free hardware. At kernel level if
> anyone would get a working system, he has to accept some compromises.
> And those compromises cou
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > *Real* firmware is not software. But *real* firmware is *firm*, that
> > is, you can't change it easily: it's in a ROM. And nobody is asking
> > us to distribute it.
>
> Now there's a bizarre twist on the idea that everything is software.
I don't
Hi again,
I made the minor updates on the rationale.
Following Manoj's suggestion, let me ask followings:
* Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
* Those whose name appear but not seconding resolution, pleas
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
>this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
There doesn't seem to be any formal requirement for rationales to be
seconded.
Personally, I don't agree w
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
>this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
i am happy with this version of my amendment and the rationale for it.
> * Those whose name appear but no
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:10:37PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
> >this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
>
> There doesn't seem to be any formal
Mervin Here,
I spoke with you several weeks ago in regards to the rates you requested. Below
you will find specific information relating to your application. Firstly, we
have decided to accept your mórtgage applicatíon, regardless of weather your
credit is bad. We are able to offer you a 300,83
girls just fall in love with ya
look how this guy gets all the ladies on our site
"It is really working as described! And delivery time is unbeatable!"
to get additional info read here
http://youneedthis.net/mm/index.php?pid=eph2145
sorry if this is mistake
http://youneedthis.net/mm/c
Michael Banck wrote:
> Having the full source code (and not something obfuscted beyond
> recognition) for a computer program so we are able to fix bugs and, if
> necessary, fork it, seems to be essential to what we're doing, namely
> providing the world with a operating system that rocks (and is f
Michael Banck wrote:
> However, it is very hard to determine and carve in stone the 'point of
> no return' for a release, especially as we are still experimenting with
> the way we do releases. But I guess we could have the release manager
> officially declare a point somewhere in the middle of th
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Umm, I have nothing but proprietary hardware. Never had any
> non-proprietary Hardware. most people don't. Indeed, is there such
> a thing as non-proprietary hardware?
Yes. It's not at *all* common, but if you have completely freely
implementable/modifiable specs fo
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 03:01:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Michael Banck wrote:
> > In contrast, having the possibilty to modify $APPLICATION's stock
> > 'File->Open' icon in its native form, i.e. gimp layers or whatever seems
> > to be of less importance by several orders of magnitude, as
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 03:01:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Hmm. How about an image provided as a binary pixmap dumped as hex and
> embedded into a C source file? :-) (Yes, I found one.) Would that qaulify
> as sufficiently removed from the native form to be an incredible pain in
> the n
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 02:26:18PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> You'd find even less people who'd design fonts. And I don't know how
> many would just modify a given font or rather create a new one from
> scratch.
For the record, I have created a font (this was an apl font, back in
the mid 90s).
Email is Loading . . . .
Image-Not-Showing? F.D.A & U.S.D.A Ap.proved, S.ave M.oney - Or.der T.oday
giacomo consecutive barium dun tuscan lump dominick latex apricot bloc concurrent beast chuck brake divest ebullient bemadden directrix damp abysmal alligator fearsome voltaire concordant coat
The PHP License, version 3.0
Copyright (c) 1999 - 2002 The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms
On 2004-05-06 17:38:17 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The PHP License, version 3.0
Copyright (c) 1999 - 2002 The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
You may like to fix your autoresponder, PHP.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 4 May 2004 00:16:25 +0200, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, Since Craig's proposal [1] seems to have gotten enough seconds
> [2], let me summarize it while giving a new concise title and a new
> thread. Excuse me if I am biased.
If you want to see this adopted as the r
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for my bad english, but that's exactly my point of view: not all
> software can be truly free without a free hardware. At kernel level if
> anyone would get a working system, he has to accept some compromises.
> And those compromises cou
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > *Real* firmware is not software. But *real* firmware is *firm*, that
> > is, you can't change it easily: it's in a ROM. And nobody is asking
> > us to distribute it.
>
> Now there's a bizarre twist on the idea that everything is software.
I don't
Hi again,
I made the minor updates on the rationale.
Following Manoj's suggestion, let me ask followings:
* Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
* Those whose name appear but not seconding resolution, pleas
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
>this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
There doesn't seem to be any formal requirement for rationales to be
seconded.
Personally, I don't agree w
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
>this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
i am happy with this version of my amendment and the rationale for it.
> * Those whose name appear but no
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:10:37PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
> >this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
>
> There doesn't seem to be any formal
Mervin Here,
I spoke with you several weeks ago in regards to the rates you requested. Below you
will find specific information relating to your application. Firstly, we have decided
to accept your mórtgage applicatíon, regardless of weather your credit is bad. We are
able to offer you a 300,83
Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.58/dose
Hydrocodone$2.17/dose
Xanax...$2.53/dose
Valium..$2.67/dose
Phentermine..$0.80/dose
Stock is limit
38 matches
Mail list logo
