Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are mistaken. It also applies if a package needs a piece of software
> which isn't distributable by Debian, not even in non-free (for a
> concrete example, see the java packages that can't be compiled by free
> compilers)
Ah, thanks for the correc
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:48:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You are mistaken. It also applies if a package needs a piece of software
> > which isn't distributable by Debian, not even in non-free (for a
> > concrete example, see the java
hoffentlich klapt es Ursula
--
Guenter Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:16:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In the specific case of General Resolution 2004_003, since that release
> currently in preparation, code named "Sarge", is very close to release,
> and the previously released version is quite out of date, our commitment
> to our u
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:40:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> "Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Organization:srivasta"@debian.org wrote:
> > There is precedence for this gap in ratifying a foundation and
> > implementing the dictats of that document; as Joey Hess reminded me:
>
> I think that th
I second the following amendment.
Simon
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:57:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes hav
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:46:25 -0500
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:17:40PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> > The wordy proposal, while wordy, covers everything - and it also
> > provides rationale and context for the user.
>
> Providing context for the user is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes have been made.]
>
On 2004-04-30 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the
> list of foundation documents the document attached in this proposal,
> titled "Transition Guide"
[...]
I second this proposal.
I second the following proposed amendment.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:57:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes h
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:33:01AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> The important part of my sentence was the first part - it "covers
> everything". Including actually releasing Sarge, which your proposal
> doesn't :)
A change to the Constitution does have to mention any specific version
of Debian.
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, and when next-generation processors will require loading firmwares
> to work, we would put them in non-free and kernels and libc in contrib.
> At that time Debian (aka main) will become just a collection of software
> as in the first d
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, and when next-generation processors will require loading firmwares
> to work, we would put them in non-free and kernels and libc in contrib.
If that happened, it would not be possible perhaps to have a free
kernel. That would be sad.
Best Pharmacy is dedicated to being your best resource for health related information and access to the most trusted online pharm
Get More Information on Follwing Topic before you Buy Drugs
No more looking for a place to get your pharmac$euticals, our online pha>rmacy is just what you need
Wan
Hi,
Francesco's points on future HW and its firmware are interesting.
IMHO, it is somewhat weak to say "firmwares are OK" for Debian main
just by this argument.
Old SC can provide an exit path out of this problem by considering the
historical context of SC, I think. Read on
On Sat, May 01,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes have been made.]
>
>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:48:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You are mistaken. It also applies if a package needs a piece of software
> > which isn't distributable by Debian, not even in non-free (for a
> > concrete example, see the java
hoffentlich klapt es Ursula
--
Guenter Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:16:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In the specific case of General Resolution 2004_003, since that release
> currently in preparation, code named "Sarge", is very close to release,
> and the previously released version is quite out of date, our commitment
> to our u
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 05:40:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> "Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Organization:srivasta"@debian.org wrote:
> > There is precedence for this gap in ratifying a foundation and
> > implementing the dictats of that document; as Joey Hess reminded me:
>
> I think that th
I second the following amendment.
Simon
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:57:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes hav
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:46:25 -0500
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:17:40PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> > The wordy proposal, while wordy, covers everything - and it also
> > provides rationale and context for the user.
>
> Providing context for the user is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes have been made.]
>
On 2004-04-30 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the
> list of foundation documents the document attached in this proposal,
> titled "Transition Guide"
[...]
I second this proposal.
I second the following proposed amendment.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:57:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
> up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
> believe any substantive changes h
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:33:01AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> The important part of my sentence was the first part - it "covers
> everything". Including actually releasing Sarge, which your proposal
> doesn't :)
A change to the Constitution does have to mention any specific version
of Debian.
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, and when next-generation processors will require loading firmwares
> to work, we would put them in non-free and kernels and libc in contrib.
> At that time Debian (aka main) will become just a collection of software
> as in the first d
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, and when next-generation processors will require loading firmwares
> to work, we would put them in non-free and kernels and libc in contrib.
If that happened, it would not be possible perhaps to have a free
kernel. That would be sad.
Best Pharmacy is dedicated to being your best resource for health related information and access to the most trusted online pharm
Get More Information on Follwing Topic before you Buy Drugs
No more looking for a place to get your pharmac$euticals, our online pha>rmacy is just what you need
Wan
Hi,
Francesco's points on future HW and its firmware are interesting.
IMHO, it is somewhat weak to say "firmwares are OK" for Debian main
just by this argument.
Old SC can provide an exit path out of this problem by considering the
historical context of SC, I think. Read on
On Sat, May 01,
30 matches
Mail list logo
