Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy decision? does

C*ialis An improved [EMAIL PROTECTED]@* irredeemable

2004-04-16 Thread Erick Brewer
Debian-vote, What do women tell if their partner take G_e_n_e_r_i_c [EMAIL PROTECTED]@: "My (s)exual life became more vivid because my lover could keep erection much longer than usual"! "..my husband worried about his erection even when it was good, and our s&ex failed!.. Taking [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >>Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in > >>much doubt on it > >where's the GR

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >>Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in much > >>doubt on it > >where's the G

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:55:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > >where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy > > >decision? > > The policy decision's at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt: > > ] Code in main and contrib must meet the DFSG, both in .debs a

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy decision? doesn't

C*ialis An improved v*i*@*g*r*@* irredeemable

2004-04-16 Thread Erick Brewer
Debian-vote, What do women tell if their partner take G_e_n_e_r_i_c [EMAIL PROTECTED]@: "My (s)exual life became more vivid because my lover could keep erection much longer than usual"! "..my husband worried about his erection even when it was good, and our s&ex failed!.. Taking [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >>Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in > >>much doubt on it > >where's the GR

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >>Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in much > >>doubt on it > >where's the G

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:55:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > >where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy > > >decision? > > The policy decision's at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt: > > ] Code in main and contrib must meet the DFSG, both in .debs a