On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:39:36PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> I'm not sure how to proceed on this non-free issue.
> If no one thinks my most recent proposal is worth sponsoring, nor even
> criticising,
Well, I've already said in the past that I think it'd be better to deal
with making the text c
I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
==
Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
programs that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, we
reaffirm our commitment to providing the
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony towns wrote:
>
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to t
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 03:12:32PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Paragraphs 1 to 4 of the social contract are replaced with the
> following text:
>
> 1. Debian will remain 100% free
>
> We provide the guidelines that we use to determine if a work is "free"
> in the document entitled "The Debian
Hello,
I am still unhappy because it is so hard to find out,
how many and which proposals are competing in the planned GR.
I found the following ones in the list archives:
1) Andrew Suffield
submitted 20 Jan 2004 and modified 22 Jan 2004
Seconds:
Chad Walstrom
Remi Vanicat
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Fre
Anthony Towns wrote:
I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
==
Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
programs that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, we
reaffirm our com
Anthony Towns writes:
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, we
> reaffirm our commitment to providing the contrib and non-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 February 2004 15:50, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
> >
> > ==
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:39:36PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> I'm not sure how to proceed on this non-free issue.
> If no one thinks my most recent proposal is worth sponsoring, nor even
> criticising,
Well, I've already said in the past that I think it'd be better to deal
with making the text c
I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
==
Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
programs that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, we
reaffirm our commitment to providing the
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony towns wrote:
>
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to t
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 03:12:32PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Paragraphs 1 to 4 of the social contract are replaced with the
> following text:
>
> 1. Debian will remain 100% free
>
> We provide the guidelines that we use to determine if a work is "free"
> in the document entitled "The Debian
Hello,
I am still unhappy because it is so hard to find out,
how many and which proposals are competing in the planned GR.
I found the following ones in the list archives:
1) Andrew Suffield
submitted 20 Jan 2004 and modified 22 Jan 2004
Seconds:
Chad Walstrom
Remi Vanicat
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Fre
Anthony Towns wrote:
I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
==
Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
programs that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, we
reaffirm our commi
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, we
> reaffirm our commitment to providing t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 February 2004 15:50, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
> >
> > ==
24 matches
Mail list logo
