Branden Robinson wrote, in
>E) I say I'm willing to seriously consider breaking up my proposal if
> the Project Secretary can help me identify how many axes of
> orthogonality he perceives in my original RFD.
These are the axes I see.
(1) Removal of clause 5, so that non-free is not guarante
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:11:55 -0500, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:21:18PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>> > In general, people who wish to vote insincerely need to have
>> > highly accurate predictions of the outcome of the vote to make
>> > sure their insincere
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 03:27:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Sure there is; people might legitimately want to vote:
> [ ] Change social contract, remove non-free
> [ ] Change social contract, don't remove non-free
> [ ] Don't change social contract, don't remove non-free
Branden Robinson wrote, in
>E) I say I'm willing to seriously consider breaking up my proposal if
> the Project Secretary can help me identify how many axes of
> orthogonality he perceives in my original RFD.
These are the axes I see.
(1) Removal of clause 5, so that non-free is not guaranteed
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:11:55 -0500, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:21:18PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>> > In general, people who wish to vote insincerely need to have
>> > highly accurate predictions of the outcome of the vote to make
>> > sure their insincere
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 03:27:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Sure there is; people might legitimately want to vote:
> [ ] Change social contract, remove non-free
> [ ] Change social contract, don't remove non-free
> [ ] Don't change social contract, don't remove non-free
6 matches
Mail list logo
