Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Peter Karlsson
Manoj Srivastava: > If people cannot understand: > "Do _NOT_ encrypt your ballot; the voting mechanism shall not be > able to decrypt your message." > they should not be getting a say in amending our constitution. To me, the meaning seems clear: The voting software is located in

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 06:29:33 +0100 (CET), Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava: >> If people cannot understand: "Do _NOT_ encrypt your ballot; the >> voting mechanism shall not be able to decrypt your message." they >> should not be getting a say in amending our constitut

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Manoj Srivastava: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 06:29:33 +0100 (CET), Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > I think you need a better grammar book. > I shall ... They will. > I will ... They shall. > Don't use a confusing rule when a simpler one will suffice. The simple rule i

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 02:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I think you need a better grammar book. I think you need a grammar book published after 1908[1] The English spoken in 1908 is not the English spoken today. And getting weird of weird rules is certainly a nice improvement --- English has

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Peter Karlsson
Manoj Srivastava: > I think you need a better grammar book. > I shall ... They will. > I will ... They shall. I thought your intent was to use it in the sense that it is not going to have the option (passive), which would be "it will not", not the sense that you do not want it to have

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:01:24 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 02:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> I think you need a better grammar book. > I think you need a grammar book published after 1908[1] The English > spoken in 1908 is not the English spoken tod

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:28:18 +0100 (CET), Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava: >> I think you need a better grammar book. I shall ... They will. I >> will ... They shall. > I thought your intent was to use it in the sense that it is not > going to have the option (pa

what´s the prize?

2003-10-15 Thread david albarran
hi! i want to know what this is about. and if i won a prize tell me as soon as you can i´m the 50,000,000 th user, so show me the money.   david. Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

Call for votes for the Constitutional Amendment GR to disambiguate section 4.1.5

2003-10-15 Thread Debian Project Secretary
Hi, [ The 24 hour period after making a minor change to the proposals have passed with no objections. so, after a 24 hour delay, we are go again. ] FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT GR = === = === === == = == Voti

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Manoj Srivastava: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 06:29:33 +0100 (CET), Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I think you need a better grammar book. > I shall ... They will. > I will ... They shall. > Don't use a confusing rule when a simpler one will suffice. The simple rule is t

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 02:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I think you need a better grammar book. I think you need a grammar book published after 1908[1] The English spoken in 1908 is not the English spoken today. And getting weird of weird rules is certainly a nice improvement --- English has

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Peter Karlsson
Manoj Srivastava: > I think you need a better grammar book. > I shall ... They will. > I will ... They shall. I thought your intent was to use it in the sense that it is not going to have the option (passive), which would be "it will not", not the sense that you do not want it to have

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:28:18 +0100 (CET), Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava: >> I think you need a better grammar book. I shall ... They will. I >> will ... They shall. > I thought your intent was to use it in the sense that it is not > going to have the option (pas

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment

2003-10-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:01:24 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 02:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> I think you need a better grammar book. > I think you need a grammar book published after 1908[1] The English > spoken in 1908 is not the English spoken toda

what´s the prize?

2003-10-15 Thread david albarran
hi! i want to know what this is about. and if i won a prize tell me as soon as you can i´m the 50,000,000 th user, so show me the money.   david. Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

Call for votes for the Constitutional Amendment GR to disambiguate section 4.1.5

2003-10-15 Thread Debian Project Secretary
Hi, [ The 24 hour period after making a minor change to the proposals have passed with no objections. so, after a 24 hour delay, we are go again. ] FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT GR = === = === === == = == Voti