* Ean Schuessler
[snip explaination]
| This might be a good time to think about how many times you have ever
| said "thanks" to Brainfood for our years of effort and support. You know
| how often we hear that from anyone? Almost never. All we get is bitching
| and complaining, speculation about
This question goes to all candidates
1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
(such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
past or giving talks.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is use
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:51:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | This might be a good time to think about how many times you have ever
> | said "thanks" to Brainfood for our years of effort and support. You know
> | how often we hear that from anyone? Almost never. All we get is bitching
> | a
While reading your platform two things jumped out at me immediately:
1: 1.1 Sourceforge for Debian developers.
Have you considered other possibile names?
For what seem like obvious reasons (to me and a few others) it seems
like a bad idea to use the name.
In addition a few other
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> 1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
> (such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
> I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
> past or giving talks.
It
> As DPL, you can expect me to take action when I see that our policies, or
> the quality of our distribution, are being threatened. However, you need
> only expect me to act as DPL on such issues as a last resort. Most of
> the time, I think problems like the ones you point out can be addressed
Hi,
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:11:34AM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull écrivait:
> 1: 1.1 Sourceforge for Debian developers.
> Have you considered other possibile names?
>
> For what seem like obvious reasons (to me and a few others) it seems
> like a bad idea to use the name.
Well, I used
To build off of Zephaniah's questions:
It is my belief that within Debian, sound solutions to technical
problems find themselves implemented when good people are willing to do
hard work to make them happen; and indeed, your biography shows that you
have an impressive record of working hard to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is a text copy of my platform from
http://www.debian.org/vote/2002/platforms/bdale
Bdale
Introduction / Biography
My name is Bdale Garbee, and I ask you to elect me as your next Debian
Project Leader. F
Hello everyone,
The following questions are for the three Candidates:
- In our Leader Elections of 2001, one of the "hot topics" in the Debian
world was the proposal to remove the non-free archive. As most of you
know, that proposal never got resolved, and it finally ended dying
when every
Hello,
I have these questions to the candidates:
1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
(every x month)
2. The Debian Security tracks only the stable release. Raphael
have the idea of a second security team which will work on the
security of testing/unstable. What do you, Bd
Hi,
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:23:42AM -0600, Steve Langasek écrivait:
> hard work to make them happen; and indeed, your biography shows that you
> have an impressive record of working hard to solve technical problems.
Thank you !
> Do you believe there are other, non-technical obstacles tha
Noel Koethe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have these questions to the candidates:
>
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
becoming a bugfixing maniac.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly
On Mon, 04 Mär 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> > (every x month)
>
> Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
> becoming a bugfixing maniac.
Sure. I'm only interested in their opinion on this point.
--
No
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:55:29PM +0100, Jordi Mallach écrivait:
> - In our Leader Elections of 2001, one of the "hot topics" in the Debian
> world was the proposal to remove the non-free archive. As most of you
> know, that proposal never got resolved, and it finally ended dying
> when eve
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:03:40PM +0100, Noel Koethe écrivait:
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
I give a 8 month timeframe in my platform. However I'd be happy
with anything below 12 monthes.
> 3. Branden wrote in his platform about removing non-fre
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:47:58PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > No, in fact I'd venture to say it's unacceptable.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > Not only is it acceptable, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
The following people have volunteered to be on the panel for
the project leader debate.
o Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
o James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o Matthew Vernon
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:48:11AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote:
> > As DPL, you can expect me to take action when I see that our policies, or
> > the quality of our distribution, are being threatened. However, you need
> > only expect me to act as DPL on such issues as a last resort. Most of
> >
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> 1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
> (such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
> I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
> past or giving talks.
As I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> 1) Do you think we have all the legal advice necessary to begin
>implementing the crypto-in-main transition?
Yes.
> 2) Do you believe crypto-in-main is an important goal? Why or why
>not?
I touched on this in my platform. Quoting fro
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:55:29PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The following questions are for the three Candidates:
>
> - In our Leader Elections of 2001, one of the "hot topics" in the Debian
> world was the proposal to remove the non-free archive. As most of you
> kn
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:03:40PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have these questions to the candidates:
>
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
I would personally be happy with a release cycle of between 6 months to
1 year. However, see sect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) writes:
> I want to know how the
> DPL candidates would handle a situation like this so as to 1) get
> services restored quickly and securely, or at the very minimum, keep
> the rank and file informed of what's going on, and 2) not piss off
> sponsors and volun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cord Beermann) writes:
> Bdale: When i check http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] i find a lot
> of bugs, including the important bugs (#95300, #99642, #108438) that
> already contain fixes or pointers for a fix. These bugs doesn't look
> like as if you have touched them.
Bug 95300 I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
> 1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
> (such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
> I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
> past or giving talks.
I have attended many conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jordi Mallach) writes:
> Again, what is your stand about non-free & Debian?
I'm satisfied with the current situation.
I am pleased that advances in Open Source web browsers are reducing the
number of Debian users who feel they have an absolute need for software from
non-fr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Noel Koethe) writes:
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
It would be cool if we could arrange to have a major release every 12 months,
and point releases every 2-3 months. The exact intervals are less important
to me than becoming m
* Ean Schuessler
[snip explaination]
| This might be a good time to think about how many times you have ever
| said "thanks" to Brainfood for our years of effort and support. You know
| how often we hear that from anyone? Almost never. All we get is bitching
| and complaining, speculation about
This question goes to all candidates
1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
(such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
past or giving talks.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:51:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | This might be a good time to think about how many times you have ever
> | said "thanks" to Brainfood for our years of effort and support. You know
> | how often we hear that from anyone? Almost never. All we get is bitching
> | an
While reading your platform two things jumped out at me immediately:
1: 1.1 Sourceforge for Debian developers.
Have you considered other possibile names?
For what seem like obvious reasons (to me and a few others) it seems
like a bad idea to use the name.
In addition a few other
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> 1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
> (such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
> I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
> past or giving talks.
It'
> As DPL, you can expect me to take action when I see that our policies, or
> the quality of our distribution, are being threatened. However, you need
> only expect me to act as DPL on such issues as a last resort. Most of
> the time, I think problems like the ones you point out can be addressed
Hi,
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:11:34AM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull écrivait:
> 1: 1.1 Sourceforge for Debian developers.
> Have you considered other possibile names?
>
> For what seem like obvious reasons (to me and a few others) it seems
> like a bad idea to use the name.
Well, I used
To build off of Zephaniah's questions:
It is my belief that within Debian, sound solutions to technical
problems find themselves implemented when good people are willing to do
hard work to make them happen; and indeed, your biography shows that you
have an impressive record of working hard to so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is a text copy of my platform from
http://www.debian.org/vote/2002/platforms/bdale
Bdale
Introduction / Biography
My name is Bdale Garbee, and I ask you to elect me as your next Debian
Project Leader. Fo
Hello everyone,
The following questions are for the three Candidates:
- In our Leader Elections of 2001, one of the "hot topics" in the Debian
world was the proposal to remove the non-free archive. As most of you
know, that proposal never got resolved, and it finally ended dying
when everyo
Hello,
I have these questions to the candidates:
1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
(every x month)
2. The Debian Security tracks only the stable release. Raphael
have the idea of a second security team which will work on the
security of testing/unstable. What do you, Bda
Hi,
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:23:42AM -0600, Steve Langasek écrivait:
> hard work to make them happen; and indeed, your biography shows that you
> have an impressive record of working hard to solve technical problems.
Thank you !
> Do you believe there are other, non-technical obstacles that
Noel Koethe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have these questions to the candidates:
>
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
becoming a bugfixing maniac.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly
On Mon, 04 Mär 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> > (every x month)
>
> Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
> becoming a bugfixing maniac.
Sure. I'm only interested in their opinion on this point.
--
Noè
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:55:29PM +0100, Jordi Mallach écrivait:
> - In our Leader Elections of 2001, one of the "hot topics" in the Debian
> world was the proposal to remove the non-free archive. As most of you
> know, that proposal never got resolved, and it finally ended dying
> when ever
Le Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:03:40PM +0100, Noel Koethe écrivait:
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
I give a 8 month timeframe in my platform. However I'd be happy
with anything below 12 monthes.
> 3. Branden wrote in his platform about removing non-free
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:47:58PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > No, in fact I'd venture to say it's unacceptable.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > Not only is it acceptable, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
The following people have volunteered to be on the panel for
the project leader debate.
o Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
o James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o Matthew Vernon <
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:48:11AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote:
> > As DPL, you can expect me to take action when I see that our policies, or
> > the quality of our distribution, are being threatened. However, you need
> > only expect me to act as DPL on such issues as a last resort. Most of
> > t
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> 1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
> (such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
> I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
> past or giving talks.
As I s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> 1) Do you think we have all the legal advice necessary to begin
>implementing the crypto-in-main transition?
Yes.
> 2) Do you believe crypto-in-main is an important goal? Why or why
>not?
I touched on this in my platform. Quoting from
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:55:29PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The following questions are for the three Candidates:
>
> - In our Leader Elections of 2001, one of the "hot topics" in the Debian
> world was the proposal to remove the non-free archive. As most of you
> kno
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:03:40PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have these questions to the candidates:
>
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
I would personally be happy with a release cycle of between 6 months to
1 year. However, see secti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) writes:
> I want to know how the
> DPL candidates would handle a situation like this so as to 1) get
> services restored quickly and securely, or at the very minimum, keep
> the rank and file informed of what's going on, and 2) not piss off
> sponsors and volunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cord Beermann) writes:
> Bdale: When i check http://bugs.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] i find a lot
> of bugs, including the important bugs (#95300, #99642, #108438) that
> already contain fixes or pointers for a fix. These bugs doesn't look
> like as if you have touched th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
> 1. How are you going to address public auditors on major events
> (such as LWE, FOSDEM, DebConf, LinuxTag etc.) with speaches?
> I read that not all of you were going to many events in the
> past or giving talks.
I have attended many confe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jordi Mallach) writes:
> Again, what is your stand about non-free & Debian?
I'm satisfied with the current situation.
I am pleased that advances in Open Source web browsers are reducing the
number of Debian users who feel they have an absolute need for software from
non-fre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Noel Koethe) writes:
> 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> (every x month)
It would be cool if we could arrange to have a major release every 12 months,
and point releases every 2-3 months. The exact intervals are less important
to me than becoming mo
58 matches
Mail list logo
