Hi folks,
This is to acknowledge the fact that a GR Titled "IRC AS A
DEBIAN COMMUNICATION CHANNEL" was proposed by Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Wed, 31 Oct 2001, on the debian-vote mailing
list, with message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I note that failing a mention of
> 4. Item proposed to vote (after the discussion period)
> [ ] I accept the ratification of IRC channels as a communication medium
> and as such they have to follow the usual Debian policies (adapted
> for IRC habits)
Shall we next have a GR that says:
[ ] I accept that the sky is blue,
Hi,
I am not sure why we need this policy in Debian. After all,
the IRC channel in question are not run on Debian resources. The
owners of the channel may allow volunteers who happen to also be
Debian developers be in charge of the channel, but, Debian is not in
charge. By all means
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:46:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > Legislating where you can and can't talk about Debian issues is
> > bureaucracy gone mad.
> Amen to that. Why not just say "Developers should ensure that whereever
>
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For example, if we've specifically ratified #debian-private on
> openprojects for discussion of issues from -private, what does that say
> about discussing -private issues over the phone with another developer? It
> could be tapped, after all. Or how abo
> 4. Item proposed to vote (after the discussion period)
> [ ] I accept the ratification of IRC channels as a communication medium
> and as such they have to follow the usual Debian policies (adapted
> for IRC habits)
Shall we next have a GR that says:
[ ] I accept that the sky is blue, a
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Legislating where you can and can't talk about Debian issues is
> bureaucracy gone mad.
>
Amen to that. Why not just say "Developers should ensure that whereever
they decide to discuss private issues of the project, that they ma
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:46:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > Legislating where you can and can't talk about Debian issues is
> > bureaucracy gone mad.
> Amen to that. Why not just say "Developers should ensure that whereever
>
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 02:06:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:46:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >
> > > Legislating where you can and can't talk about Debian issues is
> > > bureaucracy gone mad.
> >
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For example, if we've specifically ratified #debian-private on
> openprojects for discussion of issues from -private, what does that say
> about discussing -private issues over the phone with another developer? It
> could be tapped, after all. Or how abou
Hi folks,
This is to acknowledge the fact that a GR Titled "IRC AS A
DEBIAN COMMUNICATION CHANNEL" was proposed by Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Wed, 31 Oct 2001, on the debian-vote mailing
list, with message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I note that failing a mention of a
11 matches
Mail list logo
