On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> "leader" at all, but a follower :)
Or perhaps that means he thinks it's an issue for the develope
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
One Vote (may not apply in some states)", and "Don't Blame
Me, I voted with the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> "leader" at all, but a follower :)
Strange enough, this is what the constitution expects the lead
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:26:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > CONSPIRACY!!
> > I demand a manual recount..
>
> Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
> funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
> On
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> > "leader" at all, but a follower :)
>
> Strange enough, this is what the constitution e
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> > "leader" at all, but a f
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:21:36PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> > "leader" at all, but a fol
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > > support whatever the proj
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:50:23AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > I would certainly not like to
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:45:47AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> understand that :) Rest assured that my only intention is that I firmly
> believe the leader should have an opinion and beliefs. Developers vote
OTOH, is it really necessary for the DPL to have a strong opinion on
*every* issue? I kno
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> You misunderstand. Having an opinion and trying to "lead" the project does
> not mean overriding the Developers' final decisions. Obviously the DPL
> can have one opinion, and lobby for one result, while still making
> decisions based
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > You misunderstand. Having an opinion and trying to "lead" the project does
> > not mean overriding the Developers' final decisions. Obviously the DPL
> > can have on
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said
Ben> "I'll support whatever the project supports", since that
Ben> would not be a "leader" at all, but a follower :)
The leader has to make the right decision. Thi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> "leader" at all, but a follower :)
Or perhaps that means he thinks it's an issue for the developer
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
One Vote (may not apply in some states)", and "Don't Blame
Me, I voted with the M
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> "leader" at all, but a follower :)
Strange enough, this is what the constitution expects the leade
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:26:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > CONSPIRACY!!
> > I demand a manual recount..
>
> Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
> funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
> One
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> > "leader" at all, but a follower :)
>
> Strange enough, this is what the constitution ex
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> > "leader" at all, but a fo
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:21:36PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
> > "leader" at all, but a foll
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
> > > support whatever the proje
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:50:23AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > I would certainly not like to
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:45:47AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> understand that :) Rest assured that my only intention is that I firmly
> believe the leader should have an opinion and beliefs. Developers vote
OTOH, is it really necessary for the DPL to have a strong opinion on
*every* issue? I know
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> You misunderstand. Having an opinion and trying to "lead" the project does
> not mean overriding the Developers' final decisions. Obviously the DPL
> can have one opinion, and lobby for one result, while still making
> decisions based o
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > You misunderstand. Having an opinion and trying to "lead" the project does
> > not mean overriding the Developers' final decisions. Obviously the DPL
> > can have one
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said
Ben> "I'll support whatever the project supports", since that
Ben> would not be a "leader" at all, but a follower :)
The leader has to make the right decision. This
26 matches
Mail list logo
