Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:15:19PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the
> > > > temperature down on my occ
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > > down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> > > sacrifice
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:40:33AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I for one want a DPL having a *minimum* of social skills, not one that
> promises to have them *if* elected DPL, thanks.
Please try to refrain from flaming the candidates.
Thanks,
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Craig Sanders wrote:
> i have two questions for all of you:
>
> 1. what is your stance(*) on some of the recent controversial topics aka
> flame-wars within debian?
>
> - non-free archives?
>
> - sluggish new maintainer process?
Add to it
- Maintainers who are MIA
--
If you come from
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:46:01PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> (*) please give just brief 1 or 2 paragraph statements of your
> positions, not a thesis or argument :) i want to find out what you
> think about these issues, not trigger a repeat of the flamewars (so
> please, people, just accept t
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> [please follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
No, follow-up to debian-vote, it was created for this purpose.
> I cannot at present find a canonical list of current delegates.
I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
on www.debian.or
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [please follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> No, follow-up to debian-vote, it was created for this purpose.
seconded.
> > I cannot at present find a canonical list of current delegates.
> I'm
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:44:06AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:40:33AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I for one want a DPL having a *minimum* of social skills, not one that
> > promises to have them *if* elected DPL, thanks.
>
> Please try to refrain from flaming the c
> > Please try to refrain from flaming the candidates.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:22:09AM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> Why should he?
Ok: please try to refrain from flaming anyone here.
Thanks,
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:41:21AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> Out of curiosity: are you asking for points to be repeated if the
> candidate already addressed the issue in his platform?
a brief statement from all nominees would be useful for comparison
purposes.
craig
--
craig sanders <[EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My name is Bdale Garbee, and I ask you to elect me as your next Debian
Project Leader. Since I'm sure some of you are curious, Bdale is a contraction
of Barksdale, and I pronounce it "Bee-Dale".
The role of the DPL as defined by our constitution
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [please follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> No, follow-up to debian-vote, it was created for this purpose.
I thought it was supposed to be confined to the mechanics of actual voting,
which
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> I can't accept that "people truly deserve to be insulted".
Hmm. How about if we rephrase that "There are certain people
who display personality and behaviour traits that are extremely
irritating to a majority of the g
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:34:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Santiago> I can't accept that "people truly deserve to be insulted".
>
> Hmm. How about if we rephrase that "There are certain people
> who display personalit
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:46:01PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> 1. what is your stance(*) on some of the recent controversial topics aka
> flame-wars within debian?
> 2. what action, if any, do you intend to take on these issues?
>
> - non-free archives?
This issue is so controversial that
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
> > on www.debian.org and was created about 2 yaers ago.
> [...]
> > Release mana
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:52:00PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
> > > o
i have two questions for all of you:
1. what is your stance(*) on some of the recent controversial topics aka
flame-wars within debian?
- non-free archives?
- sluggish new maintainer process?
- other inflammable issues?
(*) please give just brief 1 or 2 paragraph statements of your
posit
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> > sacrifice I'm willing to make.
>
> It's funny that someone who
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:15:19PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the
> > > > temperature down on my occa
Craig Sanders wrote:
> i have two questions for all of you:
>
> 1. what is your stance(*) on some of the recent controversial topics aka
> flame-wars within debian?
>
> - non-free archives?
>
> - sluggish new maintainer process?
Add to it
- Maintainers who are MIA
--
If you come from
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > > down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> > > sacrifice
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:46:01PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> (*) please give just brief 1 or 2 paragraph statements of your
> positions, not a thesis or argument :) i want to find out what you
> think about these issues, not trigger a repeat of the flamewars (so
> please, people, just accept th
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:40:33AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I for one want a DPL having a *minimum* of social skills, not one that
> promises to have them *if* elected DPL, thanks.
Please try to refrain from flaming the candidates.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> [please follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, follow-up to debian-vote, it was created for this purpose.
> I cannot at present find a canonical list of current delegates.
I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
on www.debian.org
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [please follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No, follow-up to debian-vote, it was created for this purpose.
seconded.
> > I cannot at present find a canonical list of current delegates.
> I'm of
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:41:21AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> Out of curiosity: are you asking for points to be repeated if the
> candidate already addressed the issue in his platform?
a brief statement from all nominees would be useful for comparison
purposes.
craig
--
craig sanders <[EMAIL PR
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:44:06AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:40:33AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I for one want a DPL having a *minimum* of social skills, not one that
> > promises to have them *if* elected DPL, thanks.
>
> Please try to refrain from flaming the ca
> > Please try to refrain from flaming the candidates.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:22:09AM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> Why should he?
Ok: please try to refrain from flaming anyone here.
Thanks,
--
Raul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My name is Bdale Garbee, and I ask you to elect me as your next Debian
Project Leader. Since I'm sure some of you are curious, Bdale is a contraction
of Barksdale, and I pronounce it "Bee-Dale".
The role of the DPL as defined by our constitution
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [please follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> No, follow-up to debian-vote, it was created for this purpose.
I thought it was supposed to be confined to the mechanics of actual voting,
which DP
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> I can't accept that "people truly deserve to be insulted".
Hmm. How about if we rephrase that "There are certain people
who display personality and behaviour traits that are extremely
irritating to a majority of the ge
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:34:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Santiago> I can't accept that "people truly deserve to be insulted".
>
> Hmm. How about if we rephrase that "There are certain people
> who display personality
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:46:01PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> 1. what is your stance(*) on some of the recent controversial topics aka
> flame-wars within debian?
> 2. what action, if any, do you intend to take on these issues?
>
> - non-free archives?
This issue is so controversial that
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
> > on www.debian.org and was created about 2 yaers ago.
> [...]
> > Release manag
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:52:00PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
> > > on
36 matches
Mail list logo
