On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:52:38PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > You're mixing and matching what you apply the word "preference"
> > > to. The option ranked first is more important than the others
> > > because the voter has expressed that it's preferred to all the
> > > others. That is the fo
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:27:56AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > It is the same ballot, repeated six times. Is that really difficult to
> > understand?
> They're not the same ballot because they don't have the same options
> on them.
Actually, they do have the same options on them: Yes, No, and F
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:27:56AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > It is the same ballot, repeated six times. Is that really difficult to
> > > understand?
> > They're not the same ballot because they don't have the same options
> > on them.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:45:23AM +1000, Anthony Tow
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:52:38PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > You're mixing and matching what you apply the word "preference"
> > > to. The option ranked first is more important than the others
> > > because the voter has expressed that it's preferred to all the
> > > others. That is the fol
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:27:56AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > It is the same ballot, repeated six times. Is that really difficult to
> > understand?
> They're not the same ballot because they don't have the same options
> on them.
Actually, they do have the same options on them: Yes, No, and Fu
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:27:56AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > It is the same ballot, repeated six times. Is that really difficult to
> > > understand?
> > They're not the same ballot because they don't have the same options
> > on them.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:45:23AM +1000, Anthony Town
6 matches
Mail list logo
