> On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:02:46AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> > I would say, without such a survey taking place, that for each package
> > in non-free, there is at least one person who:
> > * has stated agreement with the DSC and DFSG
> > * uses the package, or at least believes others do
> > *
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, because you have no use for most of the stuff in non-free, it don't mean
> that other people have not need of it.
People having a use for X does not imply that Debian should distribute
X.
Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> konqueror could very well be good enough to replace Netscape.
Informational query: will konqueror work on Gnome in a reasonably
happy way? Netscape doesn't do any gnome magic, and in
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, because you have no use for most of the stuff in non-free,
>> it don't mean that other people have not need of it.
Thomas> People having a use for X does not imply that Debi
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:02:46AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> At 11:34 AM 10/2/00 +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >Well, because you have no use for most of the stuff in non-free, it don't
> >mean
> >that other people have not need of it.
> >
> >Even if the people needing it are just a few one.
> >
>
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, because you have no use for most of the stuff in non-free,
>> it don't mean that other people have not need of it.
Thomas> People having a use for X does not imply that Deb
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:02:46AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> At 11:34 AM 10/2/00 +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >Well, because you have no use for most of the stuff in non-free, it don't mean
> >that other people have not need of it.
> >
> >Even if the people needing it are just a few one.
> >
> >T
7 matches
Mail list logo
