Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free

2000-06-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 11:03:33PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > DEBIAN GENERAL RESOLUTION > > Having met the requirement for introduction, this is a formal call for > votes as per section 4.2.1 of the Debian Constitution. Only the project secretary can call for votes, see appendix A. > Debian Ge

Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

2000-06-08 Thread Matthew Vernon
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Good evening, > > This is a formal call for sponsers for the below proposed Debian > General Resolution in accordance with section 4.2 of the Debian > Constitution. I object formally to this resolution. (for reasons outlined elsewhere in this thread)

Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free

2000-06-08 Thread Darren O. Benham
I suppose it's important to point out that I, as secretary, havn't seen any sponsorships. The archives for debian-vote show only the proposal and one objection and this email. Note, the webpage doesn't seem to have been updated yet but the real archive is at /debian2/web/lists on master. On Thu,

Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free

2000-06-08 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 11:03:33PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > DEBIAN GENERAL RESOLUTION > > Proposed by: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Seconds: Stephen R. Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free

2000-06-08 Thread Branden Robinson
Darren Benham, Project Secretary, has stated that this CFV actually counts as a proposal. I second the following proposed General Resolution. On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 11:03:33PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > - -- > Debian General Resolution > > Resolved: > > A. That the Debian Social Contract

Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free

2000-06-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:49:03AM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote: > Not so.. the call for vote can only come from the proposer or one of the > sponsors. (A.2.1) I think it's a terminology confusion thing: the proponent has to request a vote, but normally the CFV is the thing that contains the bal

Re: Removing non-free - reality check.

2000-06-08 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Thanks, knghtbrd, for your summary. (I don't cc you on your request. I add cc to debian-vote where I read your mail.) In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:41:35 -0700, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - We're talking about doing this in woody right? Woody is g