On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:50:48PM +, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> http://privacy.net/anonymizer/ says that Konqueror applys as "Mozilla/5.0
> (compatible; Konqueror/2.0; X11)". I think this guarantees compatibility
> with Mozilla.
You can customize it as you like, modifying preferences.
by
On Thursday 26 October 2000 19:17, Matthias Kabel wrote:
> * Max Moritz Sievers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001012 18:22]:
> > Konqueror is the best browser I have tested. You can use it with
> > KHTML or with Gecko (the Mozilla rendering engine). KMail has
> > everthing I need and KNode is also quite use
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:50:48PM +, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> http://privacy.net/anonymizer/ says that Konqueror applys as "Mozilla/5.0
> (compatible; Konqueror/2.0; X11)". I think this guarantees compatibility
> with Mozilla.
You can customize it as you like, modifying preferences.
b
On Thursday 26 October 2000 19:17, Matthias Kabel wrote:
> * Max Moritz Sievers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001012 18:22]:
> > Konqueror is the best browser I have tested. You can use it with
> > KHTML or with Gecko (the Mozilla rendering engine). KMail has
> > everthing I need and KNode is also quite us
* Max Moritz Sievers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001012 18:22]:
> On Thursday 12 October 2000 11:51, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> > > konqueror could very well be good enough to replace
* Max Moritz Sievers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001012 18:22]:
> On Thursday 12 October 2000 11:51, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> > > konqueror could very well be good enough to replac
On Thursday 12 October 2000 11:51, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> > konqueror could very well be good enough to replace Netscape.
> > (however, I've not tried KDE's news and mail clien
On Thursday 12 October 2000 11:51, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> > konqueror could very well be good enough to replace Netscape.
> > (however, I've not tried KDE's news and mail clie
Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> konqueror could very well be good enough to replace Netscape.
Informational query: will konqueror work on Gnome in a reasonably
happy way? Netscape doesn't do any gnome magic, and in
Chester Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is true, but unless you are the most fanatical of GNOME users,
> konqueror could very well be good enough to replace Netscape.
Informational query: will konqueror work on Gnome in a reasonably
happy way? Netscape doesn't do any gnome magic, and i
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Buddha Buck wrote:
> Just because there is a "free replacement" doesn't mean that we should
> drop the non-free version . . . [b]ut as a user, I'm familiar with
> Navigator . . .
The ideal situation, IMO, would be to have a free counterpart for most
non-free packages which is
11 matches
Mail list logo
