Re: more GRs to come (Re: Current GRs clarification)

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:40:06AM +0200]: > Hi Holger, > > Le lundi, 8 août 2016, 13.34:07 h CEST Holger Levsen a écrit : > > So, I hereby announce that I'll propose another GR to "depeal the GR > > of 2005 and burry the idea of systematically declassifying debian-private"

Re: more GRs to come (Re: Current GRs clarification)

Hi Holger, Le lundi, 8 août 2016, 13.34:07 h CEST Holger Levsen a écrit : > So, I hereby announce that I'll propose another GR to "depeal the GR > of 2005 and burry the idea of systematically declassifying debian-private" > if *this* GR turns out to result in "further discussion". Here we are. :)

Re: more GRs to come

Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: more GRs to come"): > My current process only announces the GR once, after there were > enough seconds. It might take me some days to find the time to > set up the vote page, so by that time there could already be other > proposals or not. Of course

Re: more GRs to come

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:24:28PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Perhaps it would be nice if sufficiently-seconded GR amendments, or > accepted GR amendments, were announced on d-d-a, by the Secretary. My current process only announces the GR once, after there were enough seconds. It might take me

Re: more GRs to come

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Micha Lenk wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:33:34PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote on the > debian-private list: > > You're being very rude to every DD who participated in the discussion on > > -vote, the secretary, and myself by claiming that we intended to mislead > > you. >

Re: more GRs to come

Don Armstrong writes ("Re: more GRs to come"): > On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Micha Lenk wrote: > > But when it comes to policy, announcing the plan to do something, and > > afterwards asking in a GR to do the opposite is a simple way to foster > > real discussion. >

Re: more GRs to come

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:16:58AM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > > Finally, for future reference, it's normal for GRs to include options > > which are the opposite of the original proposal. If you care about the > > subject matter, participate in -vote. > > Right now we have been called for a vote, n

Re: more GRs to come

Hi Don, On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:33:34PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote on the debian-private list: > On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Micha Lenk wrote in response to > > > [... someone writing on debian-private that the upcoming GR was announced > > > in advance on d-d-a (<20160710135250.ga15...@roeckx.be>) so

Re: more GRs to come (Re: Current GRs clarification)

Hi, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:06:03PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt > Roeckx wrote: > > GR about declassifying debian-private > > = > > > > There are 2 options on the ballot: > > - Choice 1: Allow declassifying parts of debian-

Re: more GRs to come (Re: Current GRs clarification)

On 08/08/2016 03:34 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I expressed my surprise about a missing third option ("depeal the GR > of 2005 and burry the idea of systematically declassifying > debian-private") on #debian-private and have learned there that this > seems to have been an oversight / others agree th

more GRs to come (Re: Current GRs clarification)

Hi Kurt, thanks for these clarifications! On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:06:03PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote: > GR about declassifying debian-private > = > > There are 2 options on the ballot: > - Choice 1: Allow declassifying parts of deb