On 10224 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>> >or debian-cd, where only one person can usually use it with one precise
>> >infrastructure in mind to build the debian isos.
>> Pardon?
> I know nobody excpt manty which is able to reproduce the builds of the
> weekly/daily debian-cd thingies, and the de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sven Luther) writes:
> I know nobody excpt manty which is able to reproduce the builds of the
> weekly/daily debian-cd thingies, and the debian-cd used to build them is
> highly dependent on the archive organisation of the box on which it runs.
For what it's worth, at least joe
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:45:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:46:45AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:34:19PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I don't think any thing is actually "hidden". If you mean "not pac
[ Note Reply-To: set, we're wandering off-topic here ]
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:45:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:46:45AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Sven Luther wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:34:19PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I don't think a
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:46:45AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:34:19PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't think any thing is actually "hidden". If you mean "not packaged",
> >> autobuilder comes to mind, but a part of autobuilder (name
Sven Luther wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:34:19PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
>>
>> I don't think any thing is actually "hidden". If you mean "not packaged",
>> autobuilder comes to mind, but a part of autobuilder (namely sbuild) is
>> already in the archive.
>
>or debian-cd, where only one p
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:34:19PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:24:41 -0800, Rich Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dak is now in main. Why did it's publication take so long?
>
> Because dak is difficult to package. Read README.Debian file of dak. The first
> word ther
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:24:41 -0800, Rich Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dak is now in main. Why did it's publication take so long?
Because dak is difficult to package. Read README.Debian file of dak. The first
word there is "insanity".
> What other infrastructure is hidden from debian users
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:24:41PM -0800, Rich Rudnick said
> As a philadebian approaching half it's lifetime (ssttrecchh :), I have
> one question, and a followup.
>
> dak is now in main. Why did it's publication take so long?
It's been available from cvs.debian.org for years, at least. Things
As a philadebian approaching half it's lifetime (ssttrecchh :), I have
one question, and a followup.
dak is now in main. Why did it's publication take so long?
What other infrastructure is hidden from debian users (other than
-private), and what should be continued to be hidden?
--
To UNSUBS
10 matches
Mail list logo
