Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>That's a good
> thing for everyone; and it also explains why occasionally the NM
> frontdesk will waive this policy for people who are 'obviously' ready to
> become a Debian Developer *now* rather than in six month
Moray Allan
> On 2013-03-18 12:45, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Perhaps the candidates can comment on the fact that this already been
> > raised
> > last year
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00716.html
>
> I didn't see this subthread at the time.
>
> From reading it, I can
On 2013-03-18 12:45, Charles Plessy wrote:
Perhaps the candidates can comment on the fact that this already been
raised
last year
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00716.html
I didn't see this subthread at the time.
From reading it, I can't understand why no one who took the
Hi,
On 18/03/13 at 18:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:32:09AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Also, the wiki has pages for http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper
> > > but also for http://wik
Hi Jonathan,
On 18-03-13 08:49, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...DM status before entering NM...]
> I do not even agree that it is useful as a stepping stone.
>
> DM privileges recognize that a contributor should not have to wait on
> a DD to apply improvements within a specific domain where the DM has
Le Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:32:09AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Also, the wiki has pages for http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper
> > but also for http://wiki.debian.org/DebianProjectMember that says:
> > "Debian Develop
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> Wouter Verhelst writes:
Arno Töll writes:
>
> In fact, even the wiki says "Becoming a Debian Developer: You should be
> a Debian Maintainer for six months before applying to the Debian New
> Member Process" [1]. That's somewhat d
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Also, the wiki has pages for http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper
> but also for http://wiki.debian.org/DebianProjectMember that says:
> "Debian Developers are Debian Project Member with uploading rights"
As observed in the past,
On 18/03/13 at 00:20 +0300, Moray Allan wrote:
> I am not happy that:
>
> - People have gone for DM status because it's easier to get, but
> then not gone on to become project members, in many more cases than
> because they actively don't want to have full rights.
Or because the perceived difficu
On 16/03/13 at 22:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer status
> in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I noticed
> that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
>
> Moray, why did you vote a
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>>> Arno Töll writes:
In fact, even the wiki says "Becoming a Debian Developer: You should be
a Debian Maintainer for six months before applying to the Debian New
Member Process" [1]. That's somewhat different to the original idea of
>
On 2013-03-17 14:50, Moray Allan wrote:
On 2013-03-17 00:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer
status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I
noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray, why
On 2013-03-17 14:50, Moray Allan wrote:
On 2013-03-17 00:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer
status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I
noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray, why
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On 17-03-13 02:02, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> Arno Töll writes:
>>> In fact, even the wiki says "Becoming a Debian Developer: You should be
>>> a Debian Maintainer for six months before applying to the Debian New
>>> Member Process" [1]. That's somewhat different to the ori
On 2013-03-17 00:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I
noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray, why did you vote against?
I'll follow up t
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:35AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> Thus, the sheer number of DMs is not a really a resilient number per se,
> although I agree that the DM status itself is a good procedure.
FWIW, a more relevant number is the number of packages in the archive
"maintained by DMs," see [1]
Hi Gergely,
On 17-03-13 02:02, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Arno Töll writes:
>> In fact, even the wiki says "Becoming a Debian Developer: You should be
>> a Debian Maintainer for six months before applying to the Debian New
>> Member Process" [1]. That's somewhat different to the original idea of
>> th
Arno Töll writes:
> On 17.03.2013 00:01, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> We have close to two hundred entries in the debian-maintainers-keyring,
>> that's a respectable number, which reaffirms my recentish change of
>> heart, that the DM status is a good thing, and while it does not solve
>> all problems,
Hi,
Just throwing in my $0.02 as one of the ~200 DMs we have...
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> although I'm deliberately ignoring all the good reasons you provided,
> JFTR, many people feel obliged to become DM these days before applying
> as a DD and even many DDs understan
Hi,
On 17.03.2013 00:01, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> We have close to two hundred entries in the debian-maintainers-keyring,
> that's a respectable number, which reaffirms my recentish change of
> heart, that the DM status is a good thing, and while it does not solve
> all problems, it is, nevertheless,
Hello,
while reviewing the vote that introduced the Debian Maintainer status
in 2007 (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003_tally.txt) I noticed
that Lucas voted in favor and that Moray voted against it.
Moray, why did you vote against? Does that still hold or did you change
your mind in betwe
21 matches
Mail list logo
