On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:14:10PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> That's the first paragraph of the Constitution, not the SC.
Ah, I hadn't noticed that it was in the constitution (thanks).
However, if you look at old copies of
/usr/share/doc/debian/social-contract.txt you'll see it there as wel
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:32:06AM -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Anyways, for now at least, this is largely outside the scope of Debian
> (though, looking at the social contract, the most recent editorial
> changes managed to remove the introductory paragraph which had
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:14:10PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> That's the first paragraph of the Constitution, not the SC.
Ah, I hadn't noticed that it was in the constitution (thanks).
However, if you look at old copies of
/usr/share/doc/debian/social-contract.txt you'll see it there as wel
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:32:06AM -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to
say:
> Anyways, for now at least, this is largely outside the scope of Debian
> (though, looking at the social contract, the most recent editorial
> changes managed to remove the introductory paragraph which had
4 matches
Mail list logo
