Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-24 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
[ Sorry for the belated reply. I am not subscribed to debian-vote and noticed your post only today. ] * Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-09 12:09]: > BTW, does the factor analysis say anything about which factors tended > to be stronger? It looks to me as if all the vectors ar

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-10 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Anthony Towns [2005-05-09 14:42]: > Well, subjective and speculative is fine -- but is completely > irrelevant to the statistics. We've got plenty of places where you and > others can be subjective and speculative about the results; the whole > point of doing a statistical analysis is to be evi

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:42:54PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I don't know the statistics; but if "factor" means something similar to > "vector basis", then I would've said it meant that "in choosing > rankings, people tended to rank AT independently of other candidates". This is my understan

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-08 Thread Anthony Towns
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: Well, the whole "Discussion" section was already subjective and speculative even before I added Steve's interpretation. I think I have made it clear from the beginning. Well, subjective and speculative is fine -- but is completely irrelevant to the statistics. We've got

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-08 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Anthony Towns [2005-05-06 09:53]: > Uh, the point of analyses like these is to get an idea of trends without > being overly influenced by what your preconceived notions are -- and > claims of the form "foo was irrelevant" seem particularly inappropriate > in a statistical context if they are

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-05 Thread Anthony Towns
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-22 12:07]: I did a statistical analysis (factor analysis) of the DPL 2005 election results and put the conclusions at: http://people.debian.org/~rafael/dpl-vote-2005-analysis/ I added to the paper above some comments by

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-05 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-22 12:07]: > I did a statistical analysis (factor analysis) of the DPL 2005 election > results and put the conclusions at: > > http://people.debian.org/~rafael/dpl-vote-2005-analysis/ I added to the paper above some comments by Steve Greenlan

Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-04-22 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Hi, I did a statistical analysis (factor analysis) of the DPL 2005 election results and put the conclusions at: http://people.debian.org/~rafael/dpl-vote-2005-analysis/ Here are some excerpts of the text: Introduction The DPL 2005 election has been one of the most interesting elections