On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:20:21PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:51:01AM +0100, J??r??my Bobbio wrote:
> > To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More than
> > half didn't vote. Because the nominative tally sheet? Plain business? So
> > fed up tha
> On 19/11/14 at 15:20 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> [...]
>
> If someone is interested in doing that, it should be fairly easy to
> extract some metrics from UDD (date of last upload for each login,
> number of uploads over the last 12 months for each login, etc.), and
> then combine that w
Thanks,
Le 19/11/2014 14:16, Alberto Garcia a écrit :
> Some more data on turnout, if I didn't get anything wrong (there's a
> couple of numbers I couldn't find in vote.debian.org).
>
> The columns are
> Valid votes / No. of developers / Turnout / Description
>
> 482 / 908 = 53.08% General Res
Some more data on turnout, if I didn't get anything wrong (there's a
couple of numbers I couldn't find in vote.debian.org).
The columns are
Valid votes / No. of developers / Turnout / Description
86 / 357 = 24.08% Constitution
208 / 347 = 59.94% Leader Elections 1999
107 / 497 = 21.52% Log
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:54:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> > As far as I know Debian does not have a routinely executed exit procedure
> > where inactive DD's are being removed from the set. So looking at the
> > relation between voters
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> As far as I know Debian does not have a routinely executed exit procedure
> where inactive DD's are being removed from the set. So looking at the
> relation between voters and eligible voters doesn't lend itself to
> interpretation about th
On 19/11/14 at 15:20 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:51:01AM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More than
> > half didn't vote. Because the nominative tally sheet? Plain business? So
> > fed up that it doesn't mat
On Wed, November 19, 2014 10:51, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More than
> half didn't vote. Because the nominative tally sheet? Plain business? So
> fed up that it doesn't matter anymore?
As far as I know Debian does not have a routinely execute
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:51:01AM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More
> than half didn't vote. Because the nominative tally sheet? Plain
> business? So fed up that it doesn't matter anymore?
If I got the data right from https://www.debian
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:51:01AM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More than
> half didn't vote. Because the nominative tally sheet? Plain business? So
> fed up that it doesn't matter anymore?
I have a feeling which isn't backed by anything t
Hi!
I've been looking at the tally sheet for gr_initcoupling to try to get a
bit more understanding of the lines in the project. I'm not sure I've
managed to achieve that, but I thought I could share some stats anyway.
To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More than
half didn
11 matches
Mail list logo
