(Is d-d a better list for this?)
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> The problem with an OS tax prep program is that I suspect that the "no
> warranty" bit in the license would not always be interpreted as
> literally meaning "no warranty", particularly if you encountered an
> overly pop
On Mar 06, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> It's less clear to me that there will ever be an Open Source tax preparation
> program that can handle my needs. Our tax codes are ridiculously complex
> and change every year... and my tax situation is complicated. Given the cost
> and complexity of working with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian May) writes:
> Bdale> highest-profile examples at home are Quicken and Turbotax
> Bdale> for my complex personal finances
>
> Would you consider changing to an alternative (eg. gnucash) if/when it
> does everything you need/want from it?
>
> Or, would you prefer
(Is d-d a better list for this?)
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> The problem with an OS tax prep program is that I suspect that the "no
> warranty" bit in the license would not always be interpreted as
> literally meaning "no warranty", particularly if you encountered an
> overly po
On Mar 06, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> It's less clear to me that there will ever be an Open Source tax preparation
> program that can handle my needs. Our tax codes are ridiculously complex
> and change every year... and my tax situation is complicated. Given the cost
> and complexity of working with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian May) writes:
> Bdale> highest-profile examples at home are Quicken and Turbotax
> Bdale> for my complex personal finances
>
> Would you consider changing to an alternative (eg. gnucash) if/when it
> does everything you need/want from it?
>
> Or, would you prefer
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > There is software in non-free for which no source is available.
>
> If you are talking about things other than "installers", I'll have to take
> your word for that. I haven't done an analys
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > > I wou
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > There is software in non-free for which no source is available.
>
> If you are talking about things other than "installers", I'll have to take
> your word for that. I haven't done an analy
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's n
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > > I wo
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's
> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bdale> I use computers for a lot of different kinds of tasks.
Bdale> While the vast majority of my time is spent on Debian
Bdale> systems, I'm not ashamed to use commercial software when
Bdale> there is no suitable Open Sour
> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bdale> I use computers for a lot of different kinds of tasks.
Bdale> While the vast majority of my time is spent on Debian
Bdale> systems, I'm not ashamed to use commercial software when
Bdale> there is no suitable Open Sou
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> You are quite wrong. Proprietary software is non-free, so if all non-free
Note, not "non-free is proprietary software" ...
>You ask later in this posting what "bluring" I'm refering to. Well, here
>it is.
>
>P
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> You are quite wrong. Proprietary software is non-free, so if all non-free
Note, not "non-free is proprietary software" ...
>You ask later in this posting what "bluring" I'm refering to. Well, here
>it is.
>
>
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> You are quite wrong. Proprietary software is non-free, so if all non-free
You ask later in this posting what "bluring" I'm refering to. Well, here
it is.
Prorpietary is a very restrictive term meaning that all rights allowed
under the copyright are b
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's n
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's not contrary to the
> > needs of commercial interests,
>
> You surely me
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> You are quite wrong. Proprietary software is non-free, so if all non-free
You ask later in this posting what "bluring" I'm refering to. Well, here
it is.
Prorpietary is a very restrictive term meaning that all rights allowed
under the copyright are
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's not contrary to the
> > needs of commercial interests,
>
> You surely m
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's not contrary to the
> needs of commercial interests,
You surely meant "proprietary interests" here. Commercial interests an
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's not contrary to the
> needs of commercial interests,
You surely meant "proprietary interests" here. Commercial interests a
24 matches
Mail list logo
