On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:31:42AM +1100, Clinton wrote:
> Assume a set of votes as below.
> CBA
> CBA
> CBA
> ACB
> BAC
> Not only has the condorcet winner lost, but this system has a distrubing
> property if the election is recounted, with the same set of votes, there
> is a new winner.
>
> Si
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:31:42AM +1100, Clinton wrote:
> Assume a set of votes as below.
> CBA
> CBA
> CBA
> ACB
> BAC
> Not only has the condorcet winner lost, but this system has a distrubing
> property if the election is recounted, with the same set of votes, there
> is a new winner.
>
> Si
Hi,
Sven Luther:
> Err, i don't know anything about voting system, apart from what i read
> lastly on debian-vote, but it seems to me that if you change the default
> option, (that is the 'non of the above' on ballots, right) then you are
> not rerunning the algorithm with identical votes, but the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:11:53PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Err, i don't know anything about voting system, apart from what i read
> lastly on debian-vote, but it seems to me that if you change the default
> option, (that is the 'non of the above' on ballots, right) then you are
> not rerunning
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:31:42AM +1100, Clinton wrote:
> So heres another proposal, that seems to work well in this case.
>
> (i) If the default option defeats all other options, considering its
> supermajority and quorum benefits, than it is declared the winner.
> (ii) Otherwise, conduct the b
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:31:42AM +1100, Clinton wrote:
> So the current vote counting system, as far as I can tell, has the
> property that re-running an election with identical votes can produce a
> different result. Assuming that supermajority protection is generally
> designed to promote st
Hi,
Sven Luther:
> Err, i don't know anything about voting system, apart from what i read
> lastly on debian-vote, but it seems to me that if you change the default
> option, (that is the 'non of the above' on ballots, right) then you are
> not rerunning the algorithm with identical votes, but the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:11:53PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Err, i don't know anything about voting system, apart from what i read
> lastly on debian-vote, but it seems to me that if you change the default
> option, (that is the 'non of the above' on ballots, right) then you are
> not rerunning
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:31:42AM +1100, Clinton wrote:
> So heres another proposal, that seems to work well in this case.
>
> (i) If the default option defeats all other options, considering its
> supermajority and quorum benefits, than it is declared the winner.
> (ii) Otherwise, conduct the b
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:31:42AM +1100, Clinton wrote:
> So the current vote counting system, as far as I can tell, has the
> property that re-running an election with identical votes can produce a
> different result. Assuming that supermajority protection is generally
> designed to promote st
10 matches
Mail list logo
