martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.02.1=
> 448 +0100]:
>> Debian is run by its developers - the DPL exists in order to
>> ensure that the developers are able to make appropriate decisions,
>> not to make those decisions himself.
>
also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.02.1448 +0100]:
> Debian is run by its developers - the DPL exists in order to
> ensure that the developers are able to make appropriate decisions,
> not to make those decisions himself.
Could you be a little more specific as to
- what yo
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 06:18:19PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As i understand the NEW handling is needed for :
> >
> > a) make sure the licence is ok, and the package is otherwise distribuable,
> > and maybe setup the US-big-brother survey of
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As i understand the NEW handling is needed for :
>
> a) make sure the licence is ok, and the package is otherwise distribuable,
> and maybe setup the US-big-brother survey of developer's work.
>
> b) check if the new package upload doesn't split in
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:52:47PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (following up here for now - I think it's a question that could do with
> more discussion than IRC really allows for)
>
> > I would like to know from the DPL candidates what is their opin
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 13:52, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Put simply, the constitution says that the DPL can't make technical
>> decisions that overrule other people. I agree with the constitution.
>> However, I will work to ensure that it's possible for
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think mosts people's current questioning of this is not about
> particular decisions that the ftp-masters are making (which is
> technical), but about the inability to find out what decisions are being
> made, if any, and what order those decisions ar
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 13:52, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Put simply, the constitution says that the DPL can't make technical
> decisions that overrule other people. I agree with the constitution.
> However, I will work to ensure that it's possible for people to find out
> /why/ NEW is processed t
On 02-Mar-05, 06:52 (CST), Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fundamentally, it isn't the DPLs job to make judgements about the
> technical decisions a team makes. If the ftp-masters believe that the
> current handling of the NEW queue is the best way of doing so, then
> that's their dec
9 matches
Mail list logo
