Hello developers,
It resort for this thread that OPN policy let the channel founder choose the
channel policy to a large extend.
Suppose that Debian mandate a developer as "channel founder" to found a new
channel on OPN, then Debian can setup a policy on this channel under the limit
of the OPN pol
MR.MENKE UWADEDE'
#20 MANDELA CRESENT
SANDTON SOUTH AFRICA,
FAX; 871-762 -727949.
TEL; 871-762 -727947.
.
{CONFIDENTIAL}
Dear sir,
In order to transfer out (USD 126 M) One hundred and
twenty six million United States Dollars) from
African
Development Bank. I have the cour
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> And I accept this because the population of #debian-devel is
Raphael> a representative subset of Debian which accept the decisions
Raphael> of Debian as a whole.
Rubissh. I wear many hats. I am a debian developer, bu
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> by letting future maintainers join (and
>> lurk), we'll let them learn faster how Debian works.
Anthony> Congratulations! Some actual justification for what you want
Anthony> to happen! And now, you'll even get some on point rebut
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> You're getting ridiculous... check the FACTS, check what is
Raphael> the subject of the channel, check who is there and what they
Raphael> are doing.
At the last USENIX meeting, we had a room full of people,
talking
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Le Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:43:25PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
>> I don't believe this. The only reason you brought this GR
>> forth is because you had problems with a non debian controlled IRC
>> channel operator? You
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Le Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:39:18PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
>> You are asking the wrong people here. Ask the owners of th4e
>> resource -- the OPN folks.
Raphael> OPN people have replied here. They say that it's up
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Le Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:37:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
>> I am certain many Bay area restaurants in silicon valley may
>> also qualify. But that does not give Debian the right to determine
>> policy for the res
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> The fact is that Debian is not in charge of it. But it's a common
Raphael> gathering place for many Debian developers ...
I am certain many Bay area restaurants in silicon valley may
also qualify. But that does not
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Great, I'm glad to hear that what I said is only common
Raphael> sense. Now if you can convince the operator in question to
Raphael> respect that common sense, i may have no problem stopping
Raphael> here with the GR.
Rapha
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> If you don't think that it's up to you to decide, what is the correct
Raphael> way to decide the policy for the channel ?
You are asking the wrong people here. Ask the owners of th4e
resource -- the OPN folks.
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no such GR pending, unless you interpret Raphael's that way
> (which wouldn't make a lot of sense).
Does it or does it not say that there is a irc-channel only for
developers approved by the project?
--
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nør
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shall we next have a GR that says:
>
> [ ] I accept that the sky is blue, and that things that my attempt to pass
> though it (such as aeroplanes and rockets) must obey the law of gravity.
Seconded!
> For example, if we've specifically ratified #d
Hi,
I am not sure why we need this policy in Debian. After all,
the IRC channel in question are not run on Debian resources. The
owners of the channel may allow volunteers who happen to also be
Debian developers be in charge of the channel, but, Debian is not in
charge. By all means
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For example, if we've specifically ratified #debian-private on
> openprojects for discussion of issues from -private, what does that say
> about discussing -private issues over the phone with another developer? It
> could be tapped, after all. Or how abo
Hi folks,
This is to acknowledge the fact that a GR Titled "IRC AS A
DEBIAN COMMUNICATION CHANNEL" was proposed by Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Wed, 31 Oct 2001, on the debian-vote mailing
list, with message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I note that failing a mention of
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - all #debian-* channels on OpenProjects should be open to everyone
> except #debian-private which is for registered debian developers only
> (the actual "key protection" may be replaced by a better identification
>mechanism at any time)
Can
17 matches
Mail list logo
