On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:13:46PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> The announcement mentions that both candidates are not clone candidates,
> they each reply to questions with their own point of view. What about
> other members of the project? How much do they influence in the
> decisions the DPL wil
also sprach Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.10.1533 +0100]:
> Perhaps becuase it's easier to hash out ideas in a small group for
> eventual discussion by Debian-at-large? The problem with the large
> Debian mailling lists is that there is always someone more
> interested in perceiving
On 09-Mar-05, 20:35 (CST), martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why the need for a closed council, which will surely employ closed
> means of communication among its members? Why not consult in public
> so we all know how our project is actually being led?
Perhaps becuase it's easier to h
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.07.2359 +0100]:
> Andreas and Branden are free to consult with me whenever they want
> a second opinion about a question they've been asked, just as they
> would be able to consult the "DPL team" if elected; for that
> matter, other DPL candid
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:33:21PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2005 18:09, Lucas Wall wrote:
> > > DPL remains formally responsible for all decisions.
> >
> > Does this mean he has the final word on all of them?
> >
> > > Important and/or controversial decisions are made in
On 07-Mar-05, 11:33 (CST), David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Promted by these questions but supported by many other things I've read on
> debian-* lists, I come to believe that many of Debians problems stem from the
> inability to grasp concepts like "team", "working together" and "disc
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:13:46PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> The announcement mentions that both candidates are not clone candidates,
> they each reply to questions with their own point of view. What about
> other members of the project? How much do they influence in the
> decisions the DPL wi
On Monday 07 March 2005 18:09, Lucas Wall wrote:
> > DPL remains formally responsible for all decisions.
>
> Does this mean he has the final word on all of them?
>
> > Important and/or controversial decisions are made in discussion with
> > the whole team.
>
> Will the whole team vote? or act
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:09:59PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> On 03/07/2005 01:01 PM, David Schmitt wrote:
> >On Monday 07 March 2005 16:13, Lucas Wall wrote:
> >
> >>The announcement mentions that both candidates are not clone candidates,
> >>they each reply to questions with their own point of vi
On 03/07/2005 01:01 PM, David Schmitt wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2005 16:13, Lucas Wall wrote:
The announcement mentions that both candidates are not clone candidates,
they each reply to questions with their own point of view. What about
other members of the project? How much do they influence in th
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you read the announcement[1] and the referenced paragraphs in Andreas'
> platform[2] about the workings of the team?
>
> What do you miss from there specifically?
There's little indication of how much independence each team member will
have. Would
On Monday 07 March 2005 16:13, Lucas Wall wrote:
> The announcement mentions that both candidates are not clone candidates,
> they each reply to questions with their own point of view. What about
> other members of the project? How much do they influence in the
> decisions the DPL will make? Is the
12 matches
Mail list logo
