On 3/26/21 7:09 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Perhaps said another way, the only valid reason for directing a bunch of
attention toward the FSF is if they are worth salvaging. Plenty of
comments in the last few days seem to indicate that such might not be
the case. Why not form a new organizati
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:47:59AM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The problem is that for good reason, we no longer trust the FSF under
> > its current governance to do that. What you are affectively asking
> > people to do is to pursue justice in regard to things rms did in a forum
> >
Hi,
> The problem is that for good reason, we no longer trust the FSF under
> its current governance to do that. What you are affectively asking
> people to do is to pursue justice in regard to things rms did in a forum
> where rms has much more power than they do and where rms (and the voting
>
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:46:10+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:05:26+0100, Dominik George a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > > A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> > > readmission to the FSF board.
> > >
> > > It currently has 1 availab
> "Dominik" == Dominik George writes:
Dominik> With all due respect to everyone who has been offended by
Dominik> Richard Stallman, feels oppressed by him, or is negatively
Dominik> affected by his views — every single such person has to be
Dominik> heard, their fears and sorr
Dominik George writes:
> I explicitly do NOT support this GR.
>
> My opinion, as laid out at
> https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/issues/2285:
>
> 8><--
> With the FSFE freezing its collaboration with the FS
Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26 15:07:36)
> > If you want the project to issue a statement, the exact statement
> > should be in the GR, so that people that vote know what they are
> > voting for.
>
> The statement I described is one that says "we will stand behind
> anyone who was harmed du
Hi,
> If you want the project to issue a statement, the exact statement should be
> in the GR, so that people that vote know what they are voting for.
The statement I described is one that says "we will stand behind
anyone who was harmed during their contribution to the project", not a
request to
Seconded.
José Vieira
- Mensagem de Dominik George -
Data: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:05:26 +0100
De: Dominik George
Assunto: Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to
the FSF board
Para: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Hi,
A General Resolution has
El 26/03/21 a las 13:26, Dominik George escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:31AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > [replying only to -vote - please avoid cross-posting!]
>
> OK, but you actually replied only to -devel instead of -vote.
>
> >
> > Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:26 PM Dominik George
wrote:
> > > The Debian Project make an official statement, along the lines of:
>
If you want the project to issue a statement, the exact statement should be
in the GR, so that people that vote know what they are voting for.
--
Besos,
Marga
Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26 13:26:09)
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:31AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > [replying only to -vote - please avoid cross-posting!]
>
> OK, but you actually replied only to -devel instead of -vote.
Arrgh.
> > Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26 11:05:26)
>
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:31AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> [replying only to -vote - please avoid cross-posting!]
OK, but you actually replied only to -devel instead of -vote.
>
> Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26 11:05:26)
> > Hi,
> >
> > > A General Resolution has been started
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:05:26+0100, Dominik George a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> > readmission to the FSF board.
> >
> > It currently has 1 available options, but other proposals have been
> > suggested.
>
> I explicitly do NOT supp
Hi,
> A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> readmission to the FSF board.
>
> It currently has 1 available options, but other proposals have been suggested.
I explicitly do NOT support this GR.
My opinion, as laid out at
https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-let
15 matches
Mail list logo
