> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Apologies for not having followed up on this message yet. I
Russ> got rather busy with non-Debian things for a bit.
Russ> To provide a status update, I think Kurt identified several
Russ> significant issues and we need another revision.
Hi,
On Wed, 08 Dec 2021, Russ Allbery wrote:
> * Should we say that the proposers of ballot options need to provide the
> short summaries at the end of the discussion period, or should we
> specify that the Project Secretary writes them?
I think it has always been a mix of both that has been
Apologies for not having followed up on this message yet. I got rather
busy with non-Debian things for a bit.
To provide a status update, I think Kurt identified several significant
issues and we need another revision. I hope to finish that soon, at least
by next weekend if not sooner.
There ar
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
>>> 7. Proposing a general resolution.
>>>
>>> When the Technical Committee proposes a general resolution or a
>>> ballot option in a general resolution to the project under point
>>> 4.2.1, it may delegate the authority to withdraw, amend,
Thank you very much for the review!
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>6. If a vote is canceled under point 6.3.1.4 later than 13 days
>> after the initial proposed resolution, the vote specified in
>> point 6.3.1.5 i
On 2021-11-30 at 17:36, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> 3. Minor changes to ballot options under point A.1.5 may not be made
>>after or within 24 hours of the end of the discussion period unless
>>the Project Secretary agr
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Section 6.3
> ---
>
> Replace 6.3.1 in its entirety with:
>
> 1. Resolution process.
>
>The Technical Committee uses the following process to prepare a
>resolution for vote:
>
>1. Any member of t
Hello,
I too would like to second the following quoted proposal. Thanks Russ.
On Thu 25 Nov 2021 at 07:25PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the a
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the above" and fixes two typos.
I've updated the website and changed the start
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Timo Röhling writes:
>
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am, c
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates
Russ> the formal amendment to change the default option for TC
Russ> resolutions to also be "None of the above" and fixes two
Russ> typos.
I still support this and my second s
Russ Allbery dijo [Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800]:
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of
Thanks, Russ.
Seconded.
Russ Allbery dijo [Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800]:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the above" and fixes two typos.
>
>
> Rationale
> =
Timo Röhling writes:
> I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
> (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version)
That's also my understan
I second this.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Section 4.2.4
> -
>
> Strike the sentence "The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be
> varied by up to 1 week by the Project Leader." (A modified version of
> this provision is added to section
* Pierre-Elliott Bécue [2021-11-26 09:49]:
Seconded.
I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
(If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version)
Russ Allbery wrote on 26/11/2021 at 04:25:45+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 7D80315C5736DE75 created at
> 2021-11-26T04:25:45+0100 using RSA]]
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to a
17 matches
Mail list logo
