On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 03:34:09PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> My take is there's not currently enough support on debian-vote to bring
> it to a vote.
> I'd want to see several additional people express support on debian-vote
> before I'd feel comfortable proposing a GR.
Hi Sam,
thank you ver
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:34:09 -0700
Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd want to see several additional people express support on
> debian-vote before I'd feel comfortable proposing a GR.
Sam, I was unaware of the discussion taking place but very much
support your efforts towards secret ballots.
Every voter
Sam Hartman wrote:
> Personally, I don't know if those are important enough to vote on unless
they are attached to something else.
I understand your point, but I'd still prefer that uncorrelated issues
be discussed and voted separately.
And since the Debian Constitution is such an important docum
> "Richard" == Richard Laager writes:
Richard> Your secret ballots proposal had some other procedural
Richard> housekeeping bits in it, like dealing with overrides for
Richard> the secretary. How do you feel about the consensus on that?
I think we're fairly close to a proposal th
Your secret ballots proposal had some other procedural housekeeping bits
in it, like dealing with overrides for the secretary. How do you feel
about the consensus on that?
--
Richard
5 matches
Mail list logo