Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: Discussion on eventual transition away from
source packages"):
> On Fri 2019-03-22 09:32:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I'm probably missing something, but it doesn't sound like a lot of work
> > to me? It's "jus
On Fri 2019-03-22 09:32:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm probably missing something, but it doesn't sound like a lot of work
> to me? It's "just" a service that:
> - gets notified of the existence of a git repo + tag to upload
> - fetches that git repo + tag
> - checks signature / confirm that
Le vendredi, 22 mars 2019, 09.32:55 h CEST Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> I'm probably missing something, but it doesn't sound like a lot of work
> to me? It's "just" a service that:
> - gets notified of the existence of a git repo + tag to upload
> - fetches that git repo + tag
> - checks signature /
Hello,
On Fri 22 Mar 2019 at 09:32AM +01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 21/03/19 at 18:57 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Also, it will be a drastical change and has many far reaching
>> consequences and needs lots of work nefore we are near it.
>
> I'm probably missing something, but it doesn't soun
On 15349 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm probably missing something, but it doesn't sound like a lot of work
to me? It's "just" a service that:
Same here: You think about just something that keeps the traditional
layout around. If one does that, yes, that service isn't too hard.
I was th
Hi!
On 2019/03/22 10:41, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So you really insist in hiding this interesting topic on debian-vote
> rather to switch to debian-devel?
> Reply-To was set again to debian-devel ...
I think it's a great topic and even as I'm reading about it I'm tempted
to see if I can implement a
So you really insist in hiding this interesting topic on debian-vote
rather to switch to debian-devel?
Reply-To was set again to debian-devel ...
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:32:55AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 21/03/19 at 18:57 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Also, it will be a drastical chan
On 21/03/19 at 18:57 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Also, it will be a drastical change and has many far reaching
> consequences and needs lots of work nefore we are near it.
I'm probably missing something, but it doesn't sound like a lot of work
to me? It's "just" a service that:
- gets notified o
On 15348 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Couldn't we imagine a schema where a push of an annotated signed tag to
the salsa repository triggers a gitlab-ci job that notifies a service on
ftp-master that there's a git repo with a suitable signed tag waiting?
that service could then fetch the git
Hi,
Could you stop playing with Reply-To and leave those prospective
discussions where they started? I think that it's perfectly expected for
discussions around questions asked on -vote@ to diverge a bit into
interesting sub-threads. That's just how DPL campaigns work.
It's the second time today.
Hi,
+1 for the suggestion of Lucas
-1 for discussing this on debian-vote making it hard to find later
Reply-To set to debian-devel.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 06:21:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 21/03/19 at 16:52 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Joerg Jaspert wri
On 21/03/19 at 16:52 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert writes ("Re: Questions about "Winding down my Debian
> involvement""):
> > On 15348 March 1977, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > > I won't write a long reply because it's not that important to the DPL
> > > election, but I did want to note that
12 matches
Mail list logo
