Re: Concerns about the idea of "Project Scud"

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where is the significant difference between these two scenarios? How does > identifying a particular pool of potential DPL delegates that the candidate > plans to work with, or a particular group of fellow developers that he plans > to consult, make thi

Re: Concerns about the idea of "Project Scud"

also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.09.0220 +0100]: > delegates, who have power over specific areas of ongoing responsibility (or > over "specific decisions" -- you seem to have omitted that part of the > constitution when citing?), whose decision cannot be un-delegated, but who

Re: Concerns about the idea of "Project Scud"

Op di, 08-03-2005 te 17:20 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek: > Hi Wouter, > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:36:33PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > While I agree that Debian needs change if we want to face the future, > > and that the idea of Project Scud might be the change we're looking for, > > I stil

Re: Concerns about the idea of "Project Scud"

Hi Wouter, On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:36:33PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > While I agree that Debian needs change if we want to face the future, > and that the idea of Project Scud might be the change we're looking for, > I still have a few reservations, mainly situated around the status the >