* Anthony DeRobertis [Sun, 19 Mar 2006 00:44:46 -0500]:
> Doesn't 'r' use reply-to and 'L' use Mail-Followup-To?
Yes. I don't know him but me, I map 'r' to 'L' (iow, use M-F-T) in
folders that contain list mail, so that 'r' always does the most
common action, which for lists is to reply on
martin f krafft wrote:
>True. But I, for one, have my MUA set to honour M-F-T before R-T
>though.
>
>
Doesn't 'r' use reply-to and 'L' use Mail-Followup-To?
[headers indicate he's using Mutt]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
also sprach Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.19.0135 +0100]:
> Presumably so you could debate the ballot itself...
... which is probably the rare case, when one could expect the
debater to ensure a proper recipient address. On the upshot, we'd
ensure that people don't accidentally publis
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> Why do call for votes set
>
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Presumably so you could debate the ballot itself... they did set a
proper Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] though.
Don Armstrong
Why do call for votes set
Mail-Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
?
Could we add a filter to the debian-vote list to reject mails which
include non-empty ballots?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:41:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 52717dc0-26e3-4337-a88b-cc2c260fcb51
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Jeroen van Wolffelaar
> [ 6 ] Choice 2: Ari Pollak
> [ 1 ] Choice 3: Steve McIntyre
> [ 4 ]
6 matches
Mail list logo
