Re: [BALLOT] Logo2

1999-05-28 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 03:02:01PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > As I see it there is the official without bottle and an unofficial > with a bottle. Raul just provided a colour and a B&W version of both. > > Swirl only, isn't that the Modified Swirl with an optional "Official" > statement on the -

Re: [BALLOT] Logo2

1999-05-28 Thread Peter Makholm
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looking at the current state, the logos named SWIRL will win, but > these are two logos x 2, so we have four. Err, which swirl is > will it be? Or do we need to vote again if bottle only or not, if > swirl plus bottle, or swirl only. As I see it ther

Re: [BALLOT] Logo2

1999-05-28 Thread Martin Schulze
Looking at the current state, the logos named SWIRL will win, but these are two logos x 2, so we have four. Err, which swirl is will it be? Or do we need to vote again if bottle only or not, if swirl plus bottle, or swirl only. Or am I going crazy? Regards, Joey -- The good thing abo

Re: [BALLOT] Logo2

1999-05-27 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 12:34:32AM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote: > Well, does this mean everyone who casted a vote should send it again it? > > Thanks, If did not get back an error message... no. If you ballot was accepted, then everything is fine. The only people who need to recast a ball

Re: [BALLOT] Logo2

1999-05-27 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
* PS => Project Secretary PS> [it seems that the "swirl" in MODIFIED swirl is confusing the vote PS> software with the "SWIRL" option. Here's a changed ballot that PS> should eliminate that confusion] Well, does this mean everyone who casted a vote should send it again it? Thanks, -- Davi