Hi,
Since discussion seems to have died down here, could we have a
revised draft? (I am afraid I have not had time to follow the
discussion very closely of late, but I could go and read through the
archives if I must).
I still need to make changes to the vote taking scripts to
> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns
Raul> "Dominates" invites non-technical comparisons between the
Raul> proposed mechanism and the existing mechanism. I'd like to
Raul> avoid that term if possible
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anthony> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:27:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> --
>> A.3. Voting procedure
>> 1. Each independent set of related amendments is voted on i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Raul Miller and I have been hashing this off line for a bit,
and this is what we have come up with (most of the driving came from
Raul, I am merely pushing this into the -vote list):
It still needs to be reviewed, and we'll need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
[Please follow up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In December 2000, Raul Miller proposed a GR to fix the voting
process as defined in the constitution. The GR was withdrawn until a
committee assigned to study the problem returned with a
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns
Branden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anthony> A precis:
And the full Monte:
The emails that started this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2000/debian-vote-22/msg00014.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2000/debian-vote-22/msg00015.html
http://lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
In December 2000, Raul Miller proposed a GR to fix the voting
process as defined in the constitution. The GR was withdrawn until a
committee assigned to study the problem returned with a
recommendation. We have a clear recommendation
8 matches
Mail list logo