On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Yes; please see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200302/msg6.html
> Won't you run for DPL this year? (Deadline is today 00:00 UTC)
Yes, please see
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Yes; please see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200302/msg6.html
> Won't you run for DPL this year? (Deadline is today 00:00 UTC)
Yes, please see
El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía:
> [Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
> soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
> as well, go ahead.]
>
> Hi folks,
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Won't you run for DPL
El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía:
> [Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
> soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
> as well, go ahead.]
>
> Hi folks,
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Won't you run for DPL
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:31:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Originally I planned to incorporate whatever feedback I received
> into my Platform, but now I'm less sure that's the right way to go.
It is a bad idea. If you
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:31:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Originally I planned to incorporate whatever feedback I received
> into my Platform, but now I'm less sure that's the right way to go.
It is a bad idea. If you
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:20:13PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> you also did a good job at the thankless task of Treasurer. it's a crap
> job, but somebody has to do it, and you did it well with regular reports
> and updates and generally showed good organisational skills.
I appreciate the compl
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMO, the fact that you're confrontational and opinionated is a good
> thing. the DPL should take a far more active and front-line role,
> and set the agenda (for action and for debate).
Agree completely. Bonus points for not leaving in a huff when thin
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:20:13PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> you also did a good job at the thankless task of Treasurer. it's a crap
> job, but somebody has to do it, and you did it well with regular reports
> and updates and generally showed good organisational skills.
I appreciate the compl
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMO, the fact that you're confrontational and opinionated is a good
> thing. the DPL should take a far more active and front-line role,
> and set the agenda (for action and for debate).
Agree completely. Bonus points for not leaving in a huff when thin
* Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-05 21:20]:
> one day an inactive developer will become active again, and they
> shouldn't have to go through the whole New Maintainer process
They generally don't have to go through NM again, just to submit their
GPG keys.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL P
* Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-05 21:20]:
> one day an inactive developer will become active again, and they
> shouldn't have to go through the whole New Maintainer process
They generally don't have to go through NM again, just to submit their
GPG keys.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL P
overall, i'd probably vote for you if it wasn't for the fact that you're
against having non-free in the debian ftp archives. in fact, i'd be
tempted to vote for even knowing that you're against non-free, because
the majority of developers would probably vote down any attempt to
remove it. you ma
overall, i'd probably vote for you if it wasn't for the fact that you're
against having non-free in the debian ftp archives. in fact, i'd be
tempted to vote for even knowing that you're against non-free, because
the majority of developers would probably vote down any attempt to
remove it. you ma
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:32:45PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
> I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
> the debian project and the position of the DPL.
Ugh. We have a three week campaigning period. Can we leave
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:32:45PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
> I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
> the debian project and the position of the DPL.
Ugh. We have a three week campaigning period. Can we leave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> ---CUT HERE-
>
> 1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
> order from most important to least important by placing a digit
> between the brackets to the left of
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> > Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > 19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
> > > > debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
> > and decide
>
> Since when are they 'experts'? Frankly, I want to see some law
> degrees, or the equivalent wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> ---CUT HERE-
>
> 1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
> order from most important to least important by placing a digit
> between the brackets to the left of
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
> > > debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
> > > making such decisions?
> > debian legal has t
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
> > debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
> > making such decisions?
> debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
> and decide
Since when
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
the debian project and the position of the DPL. I wish we would
see discussion on this and i propose to discuss this at debconf
in some form or an other in great(er) depth.
> 1.
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> > Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > 19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
> > > > debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
> > and decide
>
> Since when are they 'experts'? Frankly, I want to see some law
> degrees, or the equivalent wo
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
> > > debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
> > > making such decisions?
> > debian legal has t
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I hope you can post a summary. I found many questions very
> interesting since you touch the question of the role of the DPL.
> I think it would be interesting for other candidates (and for the
> community as a whole) to hear what
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
> > debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
> > making such decisions?
> debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
> and decide
Since when
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
the debian project and the position of the DPL. I wish we would
see discussion on this and i propose to discuss this at debconf
in some form or an other in great(er) depth.
> 1.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I hope you can post a summary. I found many questions very
> interesting since you touch the question of the role of the DPL.
> I think it would be interesting for other candidates (and for the
> community as a whole) to hear what
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-02
Martin> 17:58]:
>> To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
>> questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
>> woul
[Reposted to -vote, so interesting parties, such as other
maybe-DPL-candidates can benefit from my answers, or have a good laugh
at my ignorance, etc, etc, appropriate thing should be underlined.
By the way, I would be interested in what other people answered, so
please Cc the list too!]
> 1. Ra
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:58:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
[snip - ranking system]
>
> [ 2 ] attending trade shows and conferences
> [ 1 ] resolving disputes internal to the Project
> [ 2 ] representing Debi
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-02 17:58]:
> To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
> questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
> would like to communicate to me on the subjects addressed below,
> please reply to me privately and GPG-sig
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-02
Martin> 17:58]:
>> To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
>> questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
>> woul
[Reposted to -vote, so interesting parties, such as other
maybe-DPL-candidates can benefit from my answers, or have a good laugh
at my ignorance, etc, etc, appropriate thing should be underlined.
By the way, I would be interested in what other people answered, so
please Cc the list too!]
> 1. Ra
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:58:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
[snip - ranking system]
>
> [ 2 ] attending trade shows and conferences
> [ 1 ] resolving disputes internal to the Project
> [ 2 ] representing Debi
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-02 17:58]:
> To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
> questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
> would like to communicate to me on the subjects addressed below,
> please reply to me privately and GPG-sig
[Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
as well, go ahead.]
Hi folks,
As has happened at least twice in the past, I am wrestling with the
decision of whether or not to declare myself as a candidate f
[Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
as well, go ahead.]
Hi folks,
As has happened at least twice in the past, I am wrestling with the
decision of whether or not to declare myself as a candidate f
40 matches
Mail list logo
