From: Nathanael Nerode:
...
>Here you go, Steve.
>drivers/media/video/dabfirmware.h
>drivers/net/acenic_firmware.h
>drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c
>drivers/net/tokenring/smctr_firmware.h
>drivers/usb/misc/emi62_fw_m.h
>drivers/usb/misc/emi62_fw_s.h
>The above are all undistributable: sm
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> > belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> > to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We obviously do have the
> > means to remove
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:39:38PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> > belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> > to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:08:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> (someone, I'm not sure who, wrote:)
> >> > > Re-adding them at this
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:08:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Today I sent an email asking upstream to remove dgrs based on its
> uselessness; we'll see what happens.
Thanks. We should consider removing it, too then.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Descript
Steve Langasek wrote:
> If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We obviously do have the
> means to remove this particular subset of non-free f
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
(someone, I'm not sure who, wrote:)
>> > > Re-adding them at this stage
>> > > 1) is against the current social contract
>>
>> > Yes, but then so
[Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
be cross-posted to 4 lists]
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:52:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
> be cross-posted to 4 lists]
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert
Note to list-masters:
Please circumvent the ban on me for debian-release, and have the integrity
of my mails concerning this thread reach that mailing list too for
completeness of this rather important discussion. -- Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
