Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:37:12AM -0400, David Coe wrote: > I apologize if this has already been discussed, and for not raising > the question earlier. > > Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of > paragraph 5: > > > -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and s

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:37:12AM -0400, David Coe wrote: > I apologize if this has already been discussed, and for not raising > the question earlier. > > Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of > paragraph 5: > > > -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and s

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:37:12AM -0400, David Coe wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of > paragraph 5: > > > -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements. > > +5. Issue, supersede and withdr

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Smurf
Hi, > what will happen if none of them receives a 3:1 majority, but the sum > of the three does? Sorry, wrong question. This is a Condorcet vote; we don't sum anything. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Rea

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:37:12AM -0400, David Coe wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of > paragraph 5: > > > -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements. > > +5. Issue, supersede and withdr

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:37:12AM -0400, David Coe wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I apologize if this has already been discussed, and for not raising > the question earlier. > Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of > paragraph 5: > > -

Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread David Coe
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I apologize if this has already been discussed, and for not raising the question earlier. Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of paragraph 5: > -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements. > +5. Issue,

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Smurf
Hi, > what will happen if none of them receives a 3:1 majority, but the sum > of the three does? Sorry, wrong question. This is a Condorcet vote; we don't sum anything. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Rea

Re: Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:37:12AM -0400, David Coe wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I apologize if this has already been discussed, and for not raising > the question earlier. > Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of > paragraph 5: > > -

Practical question [Re: Updated proposed ballot...]

2003-10-13 Thread David Coe
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I apologize if this has already been discussed, and for not raising the question earlier. Because A, B, and C all make the same change to the first sentence of paragraph 5: > -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements. > +5. Issue,